Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In April of this year, previously sealed court records were opened in connection with the July 20, 2012, shooting attack at a Colorado movie theater. There, accused killer James Holmes allegedly caused 12 deaths and left more than 70 victims injured. The unsealed records confirmed previously unsubstantiated reports that circulated soon after the shootings: Holmes had been under treatment by a psychiatrist at the University of Colorado. In fact, Holmes' psychiatrist, Dr. Lynne Fenton, had told campus police one month before the attack that her patient had homicidal thoughts, that he had threatened and intimidated her, and that, in Dr. Fenton's professional opinion, Holmes constituted a danger to the public at large.'
The report on Holmes that Dr. Fenton gave to campus police fulfilled a legal requirement to notify local officials of dangerous patients, and was consistent with the mandate of the California Supreme Court's seminal decision, rendered 37 years before, in Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal.3d 425 (1976) (en banc).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.