Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The FASB and IASB issued the second Exposure Draft (“ED”) of the proposed new leasing rules on May 16, 2013 with a deadline for comments of Sept. 13, 2013. The ED is an improvement over the 2010 ED in that it is closer to current GAAP in areas such as the definition of the lease term and lease payments. The major impacts of the ED versus current GAAP to lessees will be: capitalizing all but short-term operating leases as an asset and liability, debt covenants may have to be revised if the new capitalized operating lease liabilities are considered debt, most equipment leases will have front-loaded P&L lease costs, and sale leasebacks with purchase options will not be accounted for as sales and leasebacks. The major impacts of the ED versus current GAAP for lessors will be: a portion of upfront sales-type lease profits will be deferred, leveraged lease accounting will be eliminated, tax credits and grants will not be reported as revenue, and most residual guarantees/insurance will not be considered financial assets. The plan is to issue a new lease accounting rule in 2014 after review of comment letters to the ED and re-deliberating identified issues. The effective date when all lessors and lessees implement the rules is likely to be in 2017, although lessees and lessors will have to show comparative results for 2015 and 2016 in their 2017 financial statements. The work to transition existing leases to the new rules will be a big undertaking, more for so lessees, but also problematic for lessors.
The ED has several controversial issues and should attract a high volume of comment letters. I believe the Boards will make some changes to the proposal to improve its effectiveness in providing useful information to readers of financial statements.
A chart offering an analysis of the key elements of the proposal and the likely outcome can be found here.
'
The FASB and IASB issued the second Exposure Draft (“ED”) of the proposed new leasing rules on May 16, 2013 with a deadline for comments of Sept. 13, 2013. The ED is an improvement over the 2010 ED in that it is closer to current GAAP in areas such as the definition of the lease term and lease payments. The major impacts of the ED versus current GAAP to lessees will be: capitalizing all but short-term operating leases as an asset and liability, debt covenants may have to be revised if the new capitalized operating lease liabilities are considered debt, most equipment leases will have front-loaded P&L lease costs, and sale leasebacks with purchase options will not be accounted for as sales and leasebacks. The major impacts of the ED versus current GAAP for lessors will be: a portion of upfront sales-type lease profits will be deferred, leveraged lease accounting will be eliminated, tax credits and grants will not be reported as revenue, and most residual guarantees/insurance will not be considered financial assets. The plan is to issue a new lease accounting rule in 2014 after review of comment letters to the ED and re-deliberating identified issues. The effective date when all lessors and lessees implement the rules is likely to be in 2017, although lessees and lessors will have to show comparative results for 2015 and 2016 in their 2017 financial statements. The work to transition existing leases to the new rules will be a big undertaking, more for so lessees, but also problematic for lessors.
The ED has several controversial issues and should attract a high volume of comment letters. I believe the Boards will make some changes to the proposal to improve its effectiveness in providing useful information to readers of financial statements.
A chart offering an analysis of the key elements of the proposal and the likely outcome can be found here.
'
The business-law issue of whether and when a corporate defendant is considered distinct from its affiliated entities emerged on December 11 at the U.S. Supreme Court, with the justices confronting whether a non-defendant’s affiliate’s revenue can be part of a judge’s calculation of the monetary remedy for the corporate defendant’s infringement of a trademark.
The most forward-thinking companies embrace AI with complete confidence because they have created governance programs that serve as guardrails for this incredible new technology. Effective governance ensures AI consistently aligns with an organization’s best interests, safeguarding against potential risks while unlocking its full potential.
It’s time for our annual poll of experts on what they expect 2025 to bring in legal tech, including generative AI (of course), e-discovery, and more.
AI’s rapid market proliferation and regulatory expansion mirrors privacy’s, and businesses should model their contractual AI compliance on the successes of privacy law’s DPA and BAA.
Traditional keyword strategies and ranking tactics are losing ground to a more dynamic approach in which optimizing for search now means optimizing for every platform and user interaction. This evolution is appropriately being called “Search Everywhere Optimization.” The redefined SEO reflects how AI is not just changing how people find information but also how businesses need to think about visibility in an increasingly connected digital ecosystem.