Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It's not always good to be Number One. According to a newly released report from the Ponemon Institute, the U.S. is the most costly country in the world in which to have a data breach. In its “2013 Cost of Data Breach: Global Analysis” study, Ponemon reported the total cost of a breach incident in the U.S. to be $5.4 million, or approximately $188 for every exposed record. (The study is available through Symantec at http://bit.ly/16j7W15.)
Lost business costs, such as abnormal turnover of customers, reputational harm and diminished goodwill, associated with a data breach averaged over $3.03 million in the U.S. Notification costs are a leading driver of total breach response costs, and giving notice too soon can raise that cost even higher, according to the report. Although the most expensive breaches were those caused by malicious attacks by hackers or criminal insiders, the majority of breaches ' 63% ' resulted from either negligence or system glitches.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.