Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Brokers who deal with commercial properties are increasingly being denied their duly earned commissions. Given the multi-million dollar transactions that are often involved in the world of commercial real estate in an area like New York City, these commissions can be considerable and worth fighting over.
Many of the commission disputes involve the following facts: 1) the broker claiming the commission has no exclusive agreement: 2) he or she has introduced the buyer or renter to the property; and 3) the owner or seller has never discussed commission terms. This common scenario results from the fact that brokerage agreements can be, and often are, oral. Hence, there are no term sheets spelling out the commission percentage.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.