Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Your new client, after 25 years of marriage, retains you to represent her in the dissolution of her marriage. During the course of discovery you learn that her husband's business, which he formed and incorporated before the marriage, has built up millions of dollars in corporate retained earnings during the marriage. The company is a “subchapter S” business entity, from which he has received a modest salary throughout the marriage, coupled with corporate distributions.
As president and sole shareholder, the husband has operated the company and devoted substantial efforts to its success, and his hard work has helped to develop the company into the profitable and valuable business it remains today. The other marital assets in the estate are modest, and your client believes she is entitled to “something” from this business after 25 years of marriage, irrespective of the fact that it is “non-marital” under state law (in this case, Illinois). How do you advise her under these circumstances? Can she assert any claim over the company's retained earnings or over its increase in value attributable to her husband's efforts? Is she entitled to any of the corporate retained earnings? How do you proceed?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.