Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Among the landmark decisions issued by the U.S. Supreme Court in the final weeks of its last session, one that affects the nation's consumers of generic drugs got less attention than it might have deserved. In Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. Inc. v. Bartlett, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4702 (U.S. 6/24/13), the court overturned the award of millions of dollars in damages to a woman injured by the use of a generic version of a patented, FDA-approved drug, after finding that the manufacturer could not be held responsible through a state-law claim for defective design, because it was actually a failure-to-warn claim in disguise.
Failure-to-warn claims against generic drug manufacturers, which by federal law are required to use the same warning labels used by manufacturers of their products' brand-name equivalents, have been precluded by the Supreme Court's 2011 decision in PLIVA Inc. v. Mensing, 131 S. Ct. 2567 (2011).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.