Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
IP News
Washington Judge Awards Syntrix $115 Million
Judge Benjamin H. Settle in Seattle increased a jury award of $95 million to include prejudgment interest of $7 million, supplemental damages in the amount of $12 million, and an ongoing royalty rate of 8% per infringing sale. The case, Syntrix Biosystems, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc., No. 10-5870 (W.D. Wa), involves technology directed towards miniaturized ligand-arrays, which are used to perform genetic testing.
After a jury trial, Illumina was found to infringe several claims of Syntrix's patent directed towards increasing the density of these arrays. D.I. 285. The jury also found that Syntrix was entitled to a reasonable royalty of 6% for past infringement. Id. For continuing infringement, Syntrix sought an ongoing royalty rather than an injunction, and requested a 9% royalty rate instead of the 6% rate the jury found for past infringement. Judge Settle noted that the jury returned a complete verdict for Syntrix in only two and a half hours, and “based on this decisiveness and the evidence offered at trial, the Court finds that Syntrix is in a stronger bargaining position than it was prior to the verdict.” D.I. 355 at 4. Judge Settle found that a 2% increase in the ongoing royalty rate adequately compensated Syntrix for this stronger bargaining position. Id.
Howard J. Shire is a partner in the New York office of Kenyon & Kenyon LLP and the Editor-in-Chief of this newsletter. Joseph Mercadante is an associate at Kenyon & Kenyon.
Washington Judge Awards Syntrix $115 Million
Judge Benjamin H. Settle in Seattle increased a jury award of $95 million to include prejudgment interest of $7 million, supplemental damages in the amount of $12 million, and an ongoing royalty rate of 8% per infringing sale. The case, Syntrix Biosystems, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc., No. 10-5870 (W.D. Wa), involves technology directed towards miniaturized ligand-arrays, which are used to perform genetic testing.
After a jury trial, Illumina was found to infringe several claims of Syntrix's patent directed towards increasing the density of these arrays. D.I. 285. The jury also found that Syntrix was entitled to a reasonable royalty of 6% for past infringement. Id. For continuing infringement, Syntrix sought an ongoing royalty rather than an injunction, and requested a 9% royalty rate instead of the 6% rate the jury found for past infringement. Judge Settle noted that the jury returned a complete verdict for Syntrix in only two and a half hours, and “based on this decisiveness and the evidence offered at trial, the Court finds that Syntrix is in a stronger bargaining position than it was prior to the verdict.” D.I. 355 at 4. Judge Settle found that a 2% increase in the ongoing royalty rate adequately compensated Syntrix for this stronger bargaining position. Id.
Howard J. Shire is a partner in the
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.