Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Practitioners of a certain age will recall the days when e-mail and cellular telephone usage were not considered secure modes of communication for the discussion of confidential or privileged matters. It was not uncommon for clients to ask that anyone participating on a conference call via cellular phone drop off when particularly sensitive information was to be discussed. Similarly, to the extent e-mail was considered an effective mode for business communication, it was never to be used for the transmission of privileged information. These mores were in place throughout the 1990s.
The legal industry always seems to be late in keeping up with ever-evolving business technology. The lag has little to do with the business of law, and everything to do with the restrictive ethics rules that govern all aspects of the practice. A watershed moment came on March 10, 1999, however, when the American Bar Association (ABA) issued Formal Opinion 99-413. The opinion broke through the fog of confusion on these issues with one simple pronouncement:
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.