Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Scenario: Shopping center landlords know it all too well. A prospective tenant expresses interest in leasing space at a shopping center. The landlord considers the prospective tenant a good addition to the tenant mix and balance at the shopping center. Negotiations follow. The tenant wants to build out its prototypical store. A letter of intent is signed. More negotiations take place. Multiple drafts of the lease are circulated. Perhaps, to close the deal, the landlord decides to give the tenant a construction allowance to offset the tenant's costs of building out the space at the shopping center. The lease is executed. Designs and plans are exchanged and approved. The tenant hires and executes a construction agreement with a general contractor. Permits are pulled. Construction begins. Draws are paid to the general contractor.
'And then ' the tenant files for bankruptcy. The work stops, the payments stop, and recordation of the mechanics' liens starts. In many states, even though the landlord has no contractual relationship with the general contractor (or, for that matter, the subcontractors, materialmen, or suppliers), the contractors who worked on construction of the tenant's store nonetheless have a right to record a lien against the landlord's fee simple interest in the property to secure payment for labor or materials supplied as part of the construction, or work of improvement. In this scenario, what remedies are available to a landlord?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.