Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Appellate courts continue to agree on the vitality and breadth of the safe harbor defense contained in Bankruptcy Code (Code) ' 546(e). It insulates from the trustee's fraudulent transfer or preference attack a “settlement payment” or “margin payment” on a “securities contract,” “commodity contract” or “forward contract” except when the debtor's payment is made with “actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud” creditors. Despite policy arguments by trustees and creditors, the Courts of Appeals have refused to add requirements to the Code's plain language. In re Quebecor World (USA) Inc., 2013 WL2460726, *1 (2d Cir. June 10, 2013) (held, payments by debtor to noteholder trustee for noteholders “in exchange for private placement notes ' clearly fell within the safe harbor for 'transfers made ' in connection with a securities contract.'”); In re Derivium Capital LLC, 2013 WL2284876, *8 (4th Cir. May 24, 2013)(held, commission payments to stockbroker shielded from recovery by “settlement payment” defense; no exception in context of Ponzi scheme); In re MBS Management Services, Inc., 690 F.3d 352, 355 (5th Cir. 2012) (held, pre-bankruptcy payments to power company for supplying electricity to debtor's apartment complexes were settlement payments on “forward contract” for purchase of a “commodity”; definition of “forward contract” clear on its face).
Academics have unsuccessfully complained about the courts' expansive reading of Code ' 546(e). See Lubben, Repeal the Safe Harbors, 18 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 319, 329-32 (2010) (describing weaknesses of safe harbor system and arguing against recent expansive definition given safe harbors by courts); Edwards & Morrison, Derivatives and The Bankruptcy Code: Why the Special Treatment? 22 Yale J. On Reg. 91, 98 (2005) (safe harbors given to derivatives “encompass ' far too many transactions.”); Note, 2012 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 423, 424 (2012) (proposing Ponzi scheme exception to safe harbor, and arguing that “safe harbors have been expanded to include securities, commodities contracts and entities for which Congress did not envision the safe harbors affording protection”) criticizing Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. v. Alfa, S.A.B.de C.V. (In re Enron Creditors Recovery Corp.) 651 F.3d 329, 339(2d Cir. 2011) (held, settlement payments include Chapter 11 debtor's pre-bankruptcy payments for early redemption of publicly traded commercial paper).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.