Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FLORIDA
Executives Convicted in Medicare Fraud Scheme
On June 28, 2013, a federal jury convicted four Hollywood Pavilion mental health care hospital executives for their involvement in a Medicare fraud scheme.
Prosecutors demonstrated that the defendants, along with co-conspirators, submitted fraudulent claims to Medicare through Hollywood Pavilion and that the defendants also paid bribes and kickbacks in order to have patients referred to their facility despite the fact that those patients did not qualify for psychiatric treatment.
In furtherance of this fraud, Hollywood Pavilion's CEO, along with other Hollywood Pavilion directors, falsified documents in order to conceal the scheme. Hollywood Pavilion carried out this scheme from 2003 through August 2012 and billed Medicare almost $70 million for services that were never rendered.
'
WASHINGTON, DC
China-Based Company and CEO Charged in Cross-Border Working Group Case
On June 20, 2013, the SEC charged China MediaExpress, a China-based advertising company, for falsely reporting business increases. The SEC alleges that this false reporting began almost immediately after China MediaExpress went public in October 2009. For instance, in the company's 2009 annual report, the company represented that it had $57 million in cash on hand when, in reality, the company had only $141,000 on hand. Not only did China MediaExpress allegedly significantly overstate its cash balances, but the company also released false information regarding its client list. The SEC's complaint alleges that, as a result of these material misrepresentations, China MediaExpress's stock tripled in value.
The company's CEO, motivated by stock incentives, allegedly directed the fraud. In order to make it appear as though the company met certain net income goals, the SEC alleges that the company, at the direction of its CEO, engaged in fraudulent accounting practices that included both fraudulent bank confirmations and statements that resulted in inflated cash balance reports.
As a result of these alleged practices, the SEC charged China MediaExpress and its CEO with violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities law. Additionally, China MediaExpress has been charged with violating reporting, books, records, and internal control provisions of the federal securities law. The SEC has also charged the company's CEO with violating provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act prohibiting lying to auditors and making false certifications. The SEC is seeking an officer and director bar against China MediaExpress's CEO and is seeking financial penalties, injunctive relief, and disgorgement against China MediaExpress.'
'
FLORIDA
Executives Convicted in Medicare Fraud Scheme
On June 28, 2013, a federal jury convicted four Hollywood Pavilion mental health care hospital executives for their involvement in a Medicare fraud scheme.
Prosecutors demonstrated that the defendants, along with co-conspirators, submitted fraudulent claims to Medicare through Hollywood Pavilion and that the defendants also paid bribes and kickbacks in order to have patients referred to their facility despite the fact that those patients did not qualify for psychiatric treatment.
In furtherance of this fraud, Hollywood Pavilion's CEO, along with other Hollywood Pavilion directors, falsified documents in order to conceal the scheme. Hollywood Pavilion carried out this scheme from 2003 through August 2012 and billed Medicare almost $70 million for services that were never rendered.
'
WASHINGTON, DC
China-Based Company and CEO Charged in Cross-Border Working Group Case
On June 20, 2013, the SEC charged China MediaExpress, a China-based advertising company, for falsely reporting business increases. The SEC alleges that this false reporting began almost immediately after China MediaExpress went public in October 2009. For instance, in the company's 2009 annual report, the company represented that it had $57 million in cash on hand when, in reality, the company had only $141,000 on hand. Not only did China MediaExpress allegedly significantly overstate its cash balances, but the company also released false information regarding its client list. The SEC's complaint alleges that, as a result of these material misrepresentations, China MediaExpress's stock tripled in value.
The company's CEO, motivated by stock incentives, allegedly directed the fraud. In order to make it appear as though the company met certain net income goals, the SEC alleges that the company, at the direction of its CEO, engaged in fraudulent accounting practices that included both fraudulent bank confirmations and statements that resulted in inflated cash balance reports.
As a result of these alleged practices, the SEC charged China MediaExpress and its CEO with violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities law. Additionally, China MediaExpress has been charged with violating reporting, books, records, and internal control provisions of the federal securities law. The SEC has also charged the company's CEO with violating provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act prohibiting lying to auditors and making false certifications. The SEC is seeking an officer and director bar against China MediaExpress's CEO and is seeking financial penalties, injunctive relief, and disgorgement against China MediaExpress.'
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.