Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Med Mal News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 28, 2013

New York Studies Show Cause of Death Is Often Misreported

The death certificate may be one of the most important pieces of evidence in a wrongful death case, yet a study published in May in the journal Preventing Chronic Disease indicates that the cause of death may often be misreported on these crucial documents. The article describes the results of two studies that asked more than 500 resident doctors in New York City teaching hospitals whether they believed in the accuracy of death certificates, and whether they themselves had ever misreported a patient's cause of death. Only about a third of them believed that death certificates are accurate overall, and about half of them admitted to having reported the wrong cause of death, often because of external pressure. Most who impugned the accuracy of the documents cited system obstructions, in which their reporting systems would not permit input of true causes of death. Particularly disturbing were the number of respondents who reported being pressed to list an alternate cause of death if the patient died of septic shock (70%) or from acute respiratory distress syndrome (34.2%). Those residents who reported listing an alternate cause of death to the real one generally blamed cardiovascular disease (64.6%) for a patient's death, with the next two false causes identified being pneumonia (19.5%) and cancer (12.4%). The journal article is available at: www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2013/12_0288.htm.

'

'CA Senate Leader Wants Discussions on MICRA

California's Senate President Pro Tem, Darrell Steinberg, says he is willing to get behind legislation to raise the damages cap set by the 38-year-old Medical Insurance Compensation Reform Act (MICRA). But first, he wants those for and against the change to get together and come up with a compromise position. “I support a reasonable increase in the MICRA cap, and I would prefer to do that legislatively,” Steinberg said. “But the best way that that can actually get done is with real conversation, real negotiation between the affected stakeholders. And I think it's an appropriate subject for discussion. That's different from whether or not we have the votes now in both houses to pass this bill.” MICRA caps non-economic damages in medical malpractice actions at $250,000, an amount that, despite inflation, has not changed since the law's passage in 1975. At the time of Steinberg's comments, no talks between the opposing sides were yet scheduled.

'

'

New York Studies Show Cause of Death Is Often Misreported

The death certificate may be one of the most important pieces of evidence in a wrongful death case, yet a study published in May in the journal Preventing Chronic Disease indicates that the cause of death may often be misreported on these crucial documents. The article describes the results of two studies that asked more than 500 resident doctors in New York City teaching hospitals whether they believed in the accuracy of death certificates, and whether they themselves had ever misreported a patient's cause of death. Only about a third of them believed that death certificates are accurate overall, and about half of them admitted to having reported the wrong cause of death, often because of external pressure. Most who impugned the accuracy of the documents cited system obstructions, in which their reporting systems would not permit input of true causes of death. Particularly disturbing were the number of respondents who reported being pressed to list an alternate cause of death if the patient died of septic shock (70%) or from acute respiratory distress syndrome (34.2%). Those residents who reported listing an alternate cause of death to the real one generally blamed cardiovascular disease (64.6%) for a patient's death, with the next two false causes identified being pneumonia (19.5%) and cancer (12.4%). The journal article is available at: www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2013/12_0288.htm.

'

'CA Senate Leader Wants Discussions on MICRA

California's Senate President Pro Tem, Darrell Steinberg, says he is willing to get behind legislation to raise the damages cap set by the 38-year-old Medical Insurance Compensation Reform Act (MICRA). But first, he wants those for and against the change to get together and come up with a compromise position. “I support a reasonable increase in the MICRA cap, and I would prefer to do that legislatively,” Steinberg said. “But the best way that that can actually get done is with real conversation, real negotiation between the affected stakeholders. And I think it's an appropriate subject for discussion. That's different from whether or not we have the votes now in both houses to pass this bill.” MICRA caps non-economic damages in medical malpractice actions at $250,000, an amount that, despite inflation, has not changed since the law's passage in 1975. At the time of Steinberg's comments, no talks between the opposing sides were yet scheduled.

'

'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.