Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The first part of this article, published last month, explained the background behind lawsuits alleging that Anheuser-Busch InBev (AB InBev) is “watering down” its beer, and that consumers can purportedly bring a class action against the company in federal court. It then described the problem of the individualized “injury inquiry” that should present an insurmountable obstacle to class certification, and different lines of reasoning courts ' particularly in the Ninth Circuit ' have applied to circumvent this highly individualized injury inquiry and certify classes.
In Part Two herein, we suggest that in federal court the injury inquiry implicates constitutional standing and the often-neglected numerosity requirement for class certification in such a way that the lines of reasoning used to circumvent the injury inquiry are inapplicable ' particularly in an industry as driven by advertising as the beer industry.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.