Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Music copyright lawyers: Don't touch that dial. Nonprofit SoundExchange Inc., which collects and distributes digital performance royalties and distributes them to artists and copyright owners, filed a'lawsuit on Aug. 26 accusing Sirius XM Radio Inc. of underpaying.
In the complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, SoundExchange claimed Sirius wasn't including certain revenues in a formula designed to calculate how much the satellite radio company should pay in royalties under its license. Sirius, according to SoundExchange, excluded revenues from pre-1972 recordings, certain premium subscription packages and products developed by XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. before it merged with Sirius in 2008.
Jenner & Block's Michael DeSanctis, the firm's former managing partner and a member of the content, media and entertainment practice, is leading SoundExchange's effort to recover damages the nonprofit estimated were worth a minimum of $50 million and possibly more than $100 million. DeSanctis said today that SoundExchange had been a “long and very good client” of the firm since around 2005.
In a formal statement, SoundExchange President and Chief Executive Officer Michael Huppe said Sirius “is knowingly withholding royalties from the creators who bring life to their service, even as the company continues to experience unprecedented and explosive growth.”
A spokesman for Sirius declined to comment.
SoundExchange, according to the complaint, collects royalties based on a formula developed by the federal Copyright Royalty Board. Under the formula, Sirius was required to pay a certain percentage of its gross revenue. SoundExchange alleged that Sirius improperly excluded certain revenues from the gross revenue it reported in violation of the federal Copyright Act.
The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Richard Leon. No hearings are currently scheduled.
Zoe Tillman is a Reporter with The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Entertainment Law & Finance. This article originally appeared as a post on'The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.
Music copyright lawyers: Don't touch that dial. Nonprofit SoundExchange Inc., which collects and distributes digital performance royalties and distributes them to artists and copyright owners, filed a'lawsuit on Aug. 26 accusing
In the complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, SoundExchange claimed Sirius wasn't including certain revenues in a formula designed to calculate how much the satellite radio company should pay in royalties under its license. Sirius, according to SoundExchange, excluded revenues from pre-1972 recordings, certain premium subscription packages and products developed by XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. before it merged with Sirius in 2008.
In a formal statement, SoundExchange President and Chief Executive Officer Michael Huppe said Sirius “is knowingly withholding royalties from the creators who bring life to their service, even as the company continues to experience unprecedented and explosive growth.”
A spokesman for Sirius declined to comment.
SoundExchange, according to the complaint, collects royalties based on a formula developed by the federal Copyright Royalty Board. Under the formula, Sirius was required to pay a certain percentage of its gross revenue. SoundExchange alleged that Sirius improperly excluded certain revenues from the gross revenue it reported in violation of the federal Copyright Act.
The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Richard Leon. No hearings are currently scheduled.
Zoe Tillman is a Reporter with The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Entertainment Law & Finance. This article originally appeared as a post on'The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.