Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Hotel Franchisor to Face Trial on Vicarious Liability Claims
The United States District Court for the District of Utah recently denied a defendant hotel franchisor's motion for summary judgment to dismiss the plaintiff hotel guests' claims of liability against the franchisor resulting from an outbreak of Legionnaire's disease in the hotel. In Licari v. Best Western Int'l, Inc., No. 2:11-cv-603, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97725 (D. Utah July 12, 2013), the plaintiff husband and wife brought claims against Best Western International, Inc., the franchisor, and the owners and operators of the Utah hotel where the outbreak allegedly occurred. Plaintiffs alleged the wife contracted Legionnaire's disease while visiting the hotel, allegedly caused by the hotel's failure to properly maintain its potable water system. The plaintiffs alleged the franchisor was liable for their damages under direct and vicarious liability theories.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.