Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b><i>Online Extra</b></i>White House Offers Incentives for Cybersecurity Program

By Andrew Ramonas
September 02, 2013

President Barack Obama's administration has drafted a potential recipe for sweetening its voluntary corporate cybersecurity program. The program is under development at the White House and is aimed at utility companies and other businesses that are key to U.S. infrastructure.

The White House on August 6 revealed possible incentives it may use to bring critical infrastructure companies into the program, which would encourage the development of capabilities to mitigate cyber risk. The potential enticements include cybersecurity insurance through agencies, reduced tort liability, easier access to federal grants and technical assistance, public recognition, and utility rate adjustments to help offset cybersecurity investments.

“Over the next few months, agencies will examine these options in detail to determine which ones to adopt and how, based substantially on input from critical infrastructure stakeholders,” Michael Daniel, the White House's top cybersecurity adviser, wrote in a blog post announcing the incentives. “We believe that sharing the findings and our plans for continued work will promote transparency and sustain a public conversation about the recommendations. Publishing these agency reports is therefore an interim step and does not indicate the Administration's final policy position on the recommend actions.” See, “Incentives to Support Adoption of the Cybersecurity Framework,” The White House Blog.

The cybersecurity program is slated to launch after the Obama administration releases in February 2014 a final framework of key practices to address cyber risk. A draft version of the framework is expected in October of this year.

Jamie Barnett, co-chairman of Venable's telecommunications group and a partner in the firm's cybersecurity practice, said the incentives are positive. But he said the White House should consider tax incentives, as well as its constraints on liability limitation without legislation.

President Obama in February signed an executive order to develop the cybersecurity program and create incentives to make critical infrastructure companies a part of it. See, “Executive Order ' Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity.” The order came after cybersecurity legislation stalled last year. Congressional Republicans were worried the legislation would create new government regulations for companies, while Democrats worried about privacy concerns. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Carper (D-DE) and other lawmakers have filed cybersecurity bills again this year.


Andrew Ramonas is a Reporter for Corporate Counsel, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy.

President Barack Obama's administration has drafted a potential recipe for sweetening its voluntary corporate cybersecurity program. The program is under development at the White House and is aimed at utility companies and other businesses that are key to U.S. infrastructure.

The White House on August 6 revealed possible incentives it may use to bring critical infrastructure companies into the program, which would encourage the development of capabilities to mitigate cyber risk. The potential enticements include cybersecurity insurance through agencies, reduced tort liability, easier access to federal grants and technical assistance, public recognition, and utility rate adjustments to help offset cybersecurity investments.

“Over the next few months, agencies will examine these options in detail to determine which ones to adopt and how, based substantially on input from critical infrastructure stakeholders,” Michael Daniel, the White House's top cybersecurity adviser, wrote in a blog post announcing the incentives. “We believe that sharing the findings and our plans for continued work will promote transparency and sustain a public conversation about the recommendations. Publishing these agency reports is therefore an interim step and does not indicate the Administration's final policy position on the recommend actions.” See, “Incentives to Support Adoption of the Cybersecurity Framework,” The White House Blog.

The cybersecurity program is slated to launch after the Obama administration releases in February 2014 a final framework of key practices to address cyber risk. A draft version of the framework is expected in October of this year.

Jamie Barnett, co-chairman of Venable's telecommunications group and a partner in the firm's cybersecurity practice, said the incentives are positive. But he said the White House should consider tax incentives, as well as its constraints on liability limitation without legislation.

President Obama in February signed an executive order to develop the cybersecurity program and create incentives to make critical infrastructure companies a part of it. See, “Executive Order ' Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity.” The order came after cybersecurity legislation stalled last year. Congressional Republicans were worried the legislation would create new government regulations for companies, while Democrats worried about privacy concerns. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Carper (D-DE) and other lawmakers have filed cybersecurity bills again this year.


Andrew Ramonas is a Reporter for Corporate Counsel, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.