Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As word of mouth moves online, lawyers occupy the same place today that hotels were in a decade ago: just starting to face the prospect of widespread use of online user reviews, and concerned that such reviews will crater their businesses. Hotels, like restaurants and consumer products before them, have learned to live with, and quite often leverage, the phenomenon of online reviews. While no system of reviews is perfect, getting enough liquidity into the “reputational ecosystem” has created a resource that helps expose those establishments offering subpar service, while celebrating the virtues of those that shine. Lawyers, who would be wise to recognize the inevitability of this trend to professional services, are often hyper-focused on the potential for negative and phony reviews. This can cause paralysis and failure to adapt to this massive change in how clients are researching lawyers. The following 10 tips will put these concerns into context and explore which methods of responding to negative feedback are effective and ethical and which ones aren't.
1. Why Reviews Are Important
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.