Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As many have noted, the world is now flat. Not only can a computer scientist in Bangalore compete with one in Mountain View for software sales, but the government of Liechtenstein can compete with the government of the United States in attracting investors' funds. In other words, if people are dissatisfied with the American tax regime, they can move their money, usually secretly, to a country with a regime that is more hospitable.
Faced with disappearing barriers to the flow of money, the U.S. government has two options. First, it can reduce the tax burden that it imposes in an effort to win the race to the bottom (or the top, depending on your perspective) and have the world's friendliest tax regime. Second, it can try to create new barriers to the outflow of money from the U.S. by stepping up criminal and civil enforcement of existing tax-related reporting requirements and creating new ones. Over the last five years, the U.S. government has emphatically chosen the second option.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.