Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In December 2012, the California Supreme Court decided a case that attempted to clarify the protective reach and interaction of the California Constitution and California labor statutes on expressive activities on privately owned California shopping centers. This article provides owners and their counsel with suggested guidelines for the restriction of expressive activities, and illustrates the types of shopping center rules that will more likely be upheld by California courts. While this article specifically addresses the interpretation of California statutes and the California Constitution, it should be noted that many jurisdictions look to California interpretations as a starting point on freedom of speech issues.
A key inquiry is whether the expressive activity is labor-related speech, which is provided greater protection than other expressive activities. California statutes protect labor-related speech in nearly all areas of a privately owned shopping center. Other expressive activities in public forum areas of the shopping center (except for certain prohibited speech, including misleading commercial speech, extortion and threats of serious bodily harm) are protected by the California Constitution's liberty of speech provision. Regardless of the type of expressive activity, labor-related or otherwise, owners should heed certain considerations in drafting and enforcing shopping center rules.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.