Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Judge OKs $150 Mil. Settlement in Flonase Class Action
In June, a' federal judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania approved a $150 million settlement by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) of a 33-member direct purchaser class action over allegations the drugmaker monopolized the market for its nasal spray Flonase. The judge also approved the payment of $50 million in attorney fees for plaintiffs class counsel.
GSK said in a statement, however, that it agreed to the settlement “in order to avoid the protracted disruption, expense and uncertainty of continuing litigation. It's important to note that in reaching the settlement, the parties have agreed that it is not an admission or evidence of any violation of any statute or law, or any liability or wrongdoing by GSK.”
The case settled shortly before going to trial and after the judge denied GSK motions for summary judgment, including one on causation and one on Noerr-Pennington immunity, which immunizes private entities from liability under antitrust laws.
“A proposed settlement totaling $150 million cash is reasonable both in absolute terms and in light of the circumstances of this litigation, particularly the risks of establishing liability at trial,” the opinion said in analyzing the reasonableness of the settlement fund in light of the risks of litigation and the best possible recovery for the class, among other factors in favor of approving the settlement. “Under this settlement, each class member can benefit from the $150 million fund immediately, and avoid the uncertainties and delay inherent in continuing to litigate this complex class action.”
Among other risks, there was no guarantee the jury would have found GSK liable or a guarantee on how the jury would have responded to the “complicated economic data necessary to show damages,” the judge reasoned. Class counsel reported they spent more than 41,000 hours litigating this case over almost five years, according to the opinion.
The average billable rate is $407 per hour, according to the judge's opinion. The lodestar multiplier is calculated by dividing the attorney fees of $50 million by the total amount of hours devoted to the litigation times the $16.75 million in class counsel's hourly rates. There is a multiplier of 2.99 in the case under the calculation, and it is within the “generally acceptable range and provides additional support for approving the attorneys' fees request.”
Once all the claims are submitted, payments will be distributed based on each class member's percentage of the total market purchases, the judge said, also approving $2.1 million from the settlement fund for the plaintiffs' counsel's expenses in prosecuting the class action.
She also approved $50,000 to class representative American Sales and $40,000 to class representative Meijer in recognition of the work they took in representing the class. The plaintiffs had sought larger incentive awards of $95,000 for American Sales and $75,000 to Meijer. American Sales filed the first complaint and litigated its case for a year before Meijer filed its own action.
There is another indirect purchaser class action involving a proposed $35 million settlement that is still pending before the court. The plaintiffs in that case are both consumers and third parties who paid for or reimbursed consumers' use of Flonase or its generic equivalents.
GSK also agreed to settle for $11 million claims from over 30 large commercial health insurers, and those insurers have agreed to give $1 million of their recovery in fees to the indirect purchaser class action counsel for “having created the benefits to be received by the SHPs (settling health plans) and/or under certain conditions for payment to the settlement class.”
' Amaris Elliott-Engel,
The Legal Intelligencer
'
'
Judge OKs $150 Mil. Settlement in Flonase Class Action
In June, a' federal judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania approved a $150 million settlement by
GSK said in a statement, however, that it agreed to the settlement “in order to avoid the protracted disruption, expense and uncertainty of continuing litigation. It's important to note that in reaching the settlement, the parties have agreed that it is not an admission or evidence of any violation of any statute or law, or any liability or wrongdoing by GSK.”
The case settled shortly before going to trial and after the judge denied GSK motions for summary judgment, including one on causation and one on Noerr-Pennington immunity, which immunizes private entities from liability under antitrust laws.
“A proposed settlement totaling $150 million cash is reasonable both in absolute terms and in light of the circumstances of this litigation, particularly the risks of establishing liability at trial,” the opinion said in analyzing the reasonableness of the settlement fund in light of the risks of litigation and the best possible recovery for the class, among other factors in favor of approving the settlement. “Under this settlement, each class member can benefit from the $150 million fund immediately, and avoid the uncertainties and delay inherent in continuing to litigate this complex class action.”
Among other risks, there was no guarantee the jury would have found GSK liable or a guarantee on how the jury would have responded to the “complicated economic data necessary to show damages,” the judge reasoned. Class counsel reported they spent more than 41,000 hours litigating this case over almost five years, according to the opinion.
The average billable rate is $407 per hour, according to the judge's opinion. The lodestar multiplier is calculated by dividing the attorney fees of $50 million by the total amount of hours devoted to the litigation times the $16.75 million in class counsel's hourly rates. There is a multiplier of 2.99 in the case under the calculation, and it is within the “generally acceptable range and provides additional support for approving the attorneys' fees request.”
Once all the claims are submitted, payments will be distributed based on each class member's percentage of the total market purchases, the judge said, also approving $2.1 million from the settlement fund for the plaintiffs' counsel's expenses in prosecuting the class action.
She also approved $50,000 to class representative American Sales and $40,000 to class representative Meijer in recognition of the work they took in representing the class. The plaintiffs had sought larger incentive awards of $95,000 for American Sales and $75,000 to Meijer. American Sales filed the first complaint and litigated its case for a year before Meijer filed its own action.
There is another indirect purchaser class action involving a proposed $35 million settlement that is still pending before the court. The plaintiffs in that case are both consumers and third parties who paid for or reimbursed consumers' use of Flonase or its generic equivalents.
GSK also agreed to settle for $11 million claims from over 30 large commercial health insurers, and those insurers have agreed to give $1 million of their recovery in fees to the indirect purchaser class action counsel for “having created the benefits to be received by the SHPs (settling health plans) and/or under certain conditions for payment to the settlement class.”
' Amaris Elliott-Engel,
The Legal Intelligencer
'
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.