Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As fallout from the Supreme Court's decision in Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011) continues to disrupt bankruptcy litigation throughout the country, the Seventh Circuit recently provided a new (and rather unfortunate) contribution to the body of post-Stern authority from the Court of Appeals level. The Seventh Circuit's new decision is notable not so much for its constitutional analysis (which is important, but merely adds to an existing circuit split that will likely be resolved by the Supreme Court next term), but for its statutory analysis of 28 U.S.C. ' 157, which could prove highly disruptive.
Wellness International
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.