Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Why Not Throw in the Design of the Kitchen Sink?

By Christopher P. Foley, Elizabeth D. Ferrill and Larry M. Sandell

When it comes to seeking patent protection for a new product, companies are often faced with a dilemma: delay patent filings until the product has proven commercial value, or gamble substantial resources trying to create a portfolio of utility and design patents for a product that may not be successful?

The first option is hazardous. In the wake of the U.S. transition to a 'first-inventor-to-file' patent system under the America Invents Act (AIA), companies seeking patent protection for new products have even more reason to preserve their patent rights before public disclosure or offer for sale. Under the AIA, the one-year grace period for filing has been limited and the risks of post-disclosure patent filings are still largely unknown. The importance of early filing was further highlighted in Hamilton Beach v. Sunbeam Products Inc., No. 2012-1581 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 14, 2013), where the Federal Circuit held that a foreign supplier's secret, pre-critical-date offer to sell a company's own design to the company (i.e., after the supplier would have manufactured it per the prospective instructions of the company) can serve as a disqualifying offer for sale. On the other hand, the USPTO has indicated that, post-AIA, a 'secret sale ' does not qualify as prior art.' (See AIA Examination Guidelines, 78 Fed. Reg. 11059, 11060 (Feb. 14, 2013).) So, companies should consider filing applications even before approaching suppliers about manufacturing their innovative products.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

When Is a Repair Structural or Nonstructural Under a Commercial Lease? Image

A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."