Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Federal Trade Commission continued to expand its reach into cybersecurity last month when it took legal action against TRENDnet, which markets Web-connected home security cameras that allowed hundreds of live video feeds to be hacked and posted online. See, “Marketer of Internet-Connected Home Security Video Cameras Settles FTC Charges It Failed to Protect Consumers' Privacy,” FTC. (A PDF of the Complaint against TRENDnet is available at http:// 1.usa.gov/17HEySw.)
The FTC said this was its first action against a marketer of an everyday product with interconnectivity to the Internet and other mobile devices ' commonly referred to as the “Internet of Things.” See, “The Internet of Things,” Insights & Publications , McKinsey & Company.
The case involved a form of deceptive advertising, explains Julia Jacobson, a Boston-based partner in the data privacy and security practice at McDermott Will & Emery.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?