Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
October 28, 2013

WASHINGTON, DC

Price-Fixing Conspiracy Investigation

On Sept. 26, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the latest round of enforcement action in its ongoing antitrust investigation into price-fixing of automotive parts. Specifically, the DOJ reached agreements with nine additional Japan-based companies and two additional individuals to enter guilty pleas to felony violations of the Sherman Act, as well as other related counts. In connection with the pleas, which remain subject to court approval, the companies have agreed to pay a combined $740 million in criminal fines. Four of the companies agreed to criminal penalties of more than $100 million, as follows: Hitachi Automotive Systems Ltd. ($195 million); Jtekt Corporation ($103.27 million); Mitsuba Corporation ($135 million); and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation (MELCO) ($190 million).

According to the DOJ, in addition to price fixing, the conspiracies perpetrated by the charged companies and individuals (along with co-conspirators, some of whom have not been charged) included collusive agreements for bid rigging and part-supply allocation to a wide range of automobile manufacturers, including Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, and the U.S. subsidiaries of the following: Honda, Mazda; Mitsubishi, Nissan, Toyota and Subaru. The conspiracies were carried out via meetings, conversations, and communications in both the U.S. and Japan. Additionally, the Government noted the conspirators' corresponding acts to conceal the conduct ' such as use of code names and remote locations. The scope of the conspiracies covered 30 different automotive parts, including alternators, ignition coils, and starter motors. In sum, the parts were sold for over $5 billion and affected 25 million purchased cars. In some instances, the conspiracies continued for more than a decade.

The two individuals charged in this round of enforcement action were Gary Walker and Tetsuya Kunida. Walker and Kunida are both former executives for the U.S subsidiaries of Japan-based suppliers. While Walker, a. U.S. citizen, was charged for his role in a conspiracy to fix the price of automotive seatbelts that spanned 2003 to February 2010, Tetsuya was charged in connection with a 2001-2012 anti-vibration rubber products conspiracy that affected suspension components and engine mounts.

In total, the Government's investigation to-date ' which has been conducted in cooperation with multiple international regulatory bodies ' has resulted in charges against 20 companies and 21 executives, resulting in combined criminal penalties in excess of $1.6 billion.

'

WASHINGTON, DC

Price-Fixing Conspiracy Investigation

On Sept. 26, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the latest round of enforcement action in its ongoing antitrust investigation into price-fixing of automotive parts. Specifically, the DOJ reached agreements with nine additional Japan-based companies and two additional individuals to enter guilty pleas to felony violations of the Sherman Act, as well as other related counts. In connection with the pleas, which remain subject to court approval, the companies have agreed to pay a combined $740 million in criminal fines. Four of the companies agreed to criminal penalties of more than $100 million, as follows: Hitachi Automotive Systems Ltd. ($195 million); Jtekt Corporation ($103.27 million); Mitsuba Corporation ($135 million); and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation (MELCO) ($190 million).

According to the DOJ, in addition to price fixing, the conspiracies perpetrated by the charged companies and individuals (along with co-conspirators, some of whom have not been charged) included collusive agreements for bid rigging and part-supply allocation to a wide range of automobile manufacturers, including Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, and the U.S. subsidiaries of the following: Honda, Mazda; Mitsubishi, Nissan, Toyota and Subaru. The conspiracies were carried out via meetings, conversations, and communications in both the U.S. and Japan. Additionally, the Government noted the conspirators' corresponding acts to conceal the conduct ' such as use of code names and remote locations. The scope of the conspiracies covered 30 different automotive parts, including alternators, ignition coils, and starter motors. In sum, the parts were sold for over $5 billion and affected 25 million purchased cars. In some instances, the conspiracies continued for more than a decade.

The two individuals charged in this round of enforcement action were Gary Walker and Tetsuya Kunida. Walker and Kunida are both former executives for the U.S subsidiaries of Japan-based suppliers. While Walker, a. U.S. citizen, was charged for his role in a conspiracy to fix the price of automotive seatbelts that spanned 2003 to February 2010, Tetsuya was charged in connection with a 2001-2012 anti-vibration rubber products conspiracy that affected suspension components and engine mounts.

In total, the Government's investigation to-date ' which has been conducted in cooperation with multiple international regulatory bodies ' has resulted in charges against 20 companies and 21 executives, resulting in combined criminal penalties in excess of $1.6 billion.

'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.