Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

FIRREA: Everything Old Is New Again

By Jonathan S. Feld, Edward W. Somers and Kara B. Murphy

In the aftermath of the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s, Congress passed a number of financial reforms, including the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA). Its purpose was to provide federal enforcement authorities with a powerful mechanism to pursue borrowers, bank officers and others whose fraudulent action “affected a federally insured financial institution.” In one high-profile prosecution, Charles Keating, the owner and chief executive of a federally insured thrift, Lincoln Savings and Loan Association (Lincoln), was charged in a multi-count indictment with myriad violations of federal law, including FIRREA. This prosecution ' with its focus on borrowers, appraisers and bank executives whose conduct harmed federally insured institutions ' was the norm for FIRREA cases for two decades.

Recent years have seen significant refocus of the FIRREA statute. Largely in response to the financial crisis of 2008, the government has brought claims against at least 2,900 individual defendants facing charges of mortgage fraud. While many cases involve causes of action based on the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. ' 3730, the government is also pursuing many of these defendants under FIRREA. 12 U.S.C. ' 1833. The language of FIRREA requiring that conduct “affect” a financial institution remains unchanged since the 1990s. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is relying on this language to address the risky lending practices of the financial institutions themselves as a basis for FIRREA claims. In other words, the focus 20 years ago was on protecting financial institutions from individuals, but FIRREA has now become an important instrument to address financial institutions' own improper lending or other business practices.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.