Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Settoon, Starr and Beyond
The vast majority of jurisdictions do not enforce strict compliance with a policy's notice provisions unless the insurer was prejudiced by the insured's failure to timely report a covered event. That general rule is not without exception, however. A pair of recent decisions by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit shows that an exception to this general rule in the context of notice provisions located in pollution buyback clauses is slowly gaining momentum, even in jurisdictions that traditionally require an insurer to show it was prejudiced by the insured's delay. Both recent decisions, Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. SGS Petroleum Serv. Corp., 719 F.3d 700 (5th Cir. 2013), and In re Matter of Complaint of Settoon Towing, L.L.C., 720 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2013), draw heavily on the Fifth Circuit's earlier decision in Matador Petroleum Corp. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 174 F.3d 653 (5th Cir. 1999).
In Matador, the Fifth Circuit, without regard to whether the insurer suffered any prejudice, applied Texas law to enforce strict compliance with a notice requirement contained in an exception to the policy's pollution exclusion. In Starr, the Fifth Circuit reaffirmed that Matador remained good law despite some potentially adverse post-Matador decisions by the Texas Supreme Court. And in Settoon, the Fifth Circuit went a step further. It applied the Matador logic and reasoning to a case involving Louisiana law, and concluded that the insurer was not required to show prejudice as a predicate to strict enforcement of the notice provision, even though Louisiana is traditionally a notice-prejudice jurisdiction.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.