Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), each year one in every three “older adults” (65 years and older) falls. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Falls Among Older Adults: An Overview, available at http://1.usa.gov/19A97Zb. According to the CDC's report, in 2010, approximately 21,000 older adults died from unintentional fall injuries. The most common fall-related injuries were fractures of the spine, hip, forearm, leg, ankle, pelvis, upper arm, and hand.
Among older adults who sustain a hip fracture, studies show that nearly 50% never regain their previous level of functioning, while 30% die within six months. John Jorgensen, MPA, RN, Reducing Patient Falls: A Call to Action, Best Practices for Falls Reduction: A Practical Guide, Mar. 2011, p. 2.
In addition to the recovery and mortality problems falls create for older adults, these events carry significant costs. When adjusted for 2010 inflation, “falls among 'older adults' cost the U.S. health care system $30 billion in direct medical costs.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Costs of Falls Among Older Adults, available at http://1.usa.gov/19huwbH.
Since in-patient falls are avoidable, in 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) joined with the CDC to enact a new payment provision whereby Medicare and Medicaid would no longer reimburse hospitals when one of eight so-called “never events” during a hospital stay led to injury. Falls were included on that list of events that should never happen after a hospital admission. Consequently, hospitals would no longer receive payment by Medicare and Medicaid for treatment related to injuries caused by in-hospital falls. Jorgensen, supra at 2. CMS and others assert that that the initiative is a “strong incentive for healthcare providers to implement practices that reduce the number of preventable patient falls.” Jorgensen, supra at 2.
Efforts to increase health care quality and decrease costs are causing hospitals throughout the country to take steps to reduce the amount of inpatient falls by adopting fall-reduction programs. One of the first places hospitals turn to for guidance on establishing these programs is the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Accordingly, attorneys representing individuals who suffered injuries resulting from an in-hospital fall should also look to the Joint Commission in order to determine whether a hospital's fall-reduction program, protocols, or policies deviated from acceptable standards of care.'
The Joint Commission
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations is an independent, not-for-profit organization whose mission is to “continuously improve health care for the public ' by evaluating health care organizations and inspiring them to excel in providing safe and effective care of the highest quality and value.” The Joint Commission, About the Joint Commission, http://bit.ly/1aaLEi9. To gain accreditation, hospitals must allow on-site surveys to determine whether the hospital is in compliance with the Commission's current National Patient Safety Goals and Provisions of Car Standards.
According to the Commission, the purpose of the National Patient Safety Goals is to improve patient safety and focus on problems in health care safety and how to solve them. The Joint Commission, 2013 Hospital National Patient Safety Goals, http://bit.ly/17WV9Ei. Because these goals and standards are revised annually, it is important for hospitals that are seeking accreditation to ensure that their safety programs are up-to-date with any new requirements or compliance procedures.
National Patient Safety Goal 9
In 2005, the Joint Commission introduced a National Patient Safety Goal to help to reduce the risk of patient harm resulting from a fall. Jorgensen, supra, at 2. Dubbed National Patient Safety Goal 9, or NPSG 09.02.01, the goal consisted of two requirements: Requirement 9A and Requirement 9B. Joint Commission Resources: Special Report! 2005 Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals: Practical Strategies and Helpful Solutions for Meeting These Goals, http://bit.ly/15VzcHh. At the time the goal was introduced, hospitals seeking accreditation were only expected to comply with Requirement 9A, which stated that hospitals must “assess and periodically reassess each patient's risk for falling, including the potential risk associated with the patient's medication regimen, and take action to address any identified risks.”
Requirement 9B, which was only applicable to long-term care facilities at the time, required: 1) the implementation of a fall reduction program, “including a transfer protocol”; and 2) that the “the effectiveness of the program” be periodically evaluated. Special Report! 2005 Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals: Practical Strategies and Helpful Solutions for Meeting These Goals, http://bit.ly/1e915M7.
In addition to complying with Requirement 9A, in 2005, hospitals were also expected to regularly assess each patient's risk for falling by reviewing “risk factors such as previous history of falls, cognitive impairment, impaired balance or mobility, musculoskeletal problems, chronic diseases, nutritional problems, and use of multiple medications.” Id. At the time, the Commission also offered the following compliance “suggestions” as part of their risk reduction strategies:
Id.
Revisions and Additions
In 2006, the Commission revised National Patient Safety Goal 9 and expanded Requirement 9B so that it applied to hospitals. Joint Commission Resources: Joint Commission Perspectives on Patient Safety, Special Report! Helping Solutions for Meeting the 2006 National Patient Safety Goals, Vol. 5, Issue 8, August 2005, available at' http://bit.ly/19AaE1s. The Commission advised that a hospital's fall reduction program “should include an assessment process, risk reduction strategies, transfer protocols, in-services, involvement of patients/families in education, and evaluation of environment of care issues.” It also offered the following tips on compliance solutions:'
'Id.
In 2008, National Patient Safety Goal 9 was again revised to include the following “Implementation Expectations” under Requirement 9B: 1) The organization establishes a fall reduction program; 2) The fall reduction program includes an evaluation as appropriate to the patient population, settings, and services provided; 3) The fall reduction program includes interventions to reduce the [patient's] fall risk factors; 4) Staff receive education and training for the fall reduction program; 5) The [patient] and [patient's] family are educated on the fall reduction program and any individualized fall reduction strategies; and 6) The fall reduction program is evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the program.
2008 National Patient Safety Goals ' Joint Commission Resources, Joint Commission Perspectives, Vol. 27, Issue 7, p. 16 (July 2007).”
The Commission further advised that a hospital's evaluation of its fall program could include an evaluation of a patient's “fall history, medications and alcohol consumption review, gait and balance screening, walking aids, assistive technologies and protective device assessment, and environmental assessments.” Id.'
In 2010, NPSG 09.02.01 was upgraded from a National Patient Safety Goal in hospitals to a Provision of Care Standard. Jorgensen, supra, at 2. The Provision of Care Standards that address reducing the risk of patient harm resulting from falls in hospitals are as follows:
Joint Commission Requirement, Approved: 2010 National Patient Safety Goals, Joint Commission Perspectives, Vol. 29. Issue 10 (October 2010).
Conclusion
Attorneys representing clients who suffer injuries resulting from an in-hospital fall should familiarize themselves with the Joint Commission's Provision of Care Standards applicable to a patient's fall to ascertain whether a defendant hospital maintained a fall prevention program consistent with applicable standards of care. In addition, by arming themselves with the applicable compliance suggestions, expectations, and solutions offered by the Commission, attorneys will be prepared to propound valuable discovery demands and effectively question physicians, nurses, representatives of the hospital and experts during depositions.'
Robert Sanfilippo is an Associate at the Roseland, NJ, firm of Starr, Gern, Davison & Rubin P.C. John Ratkowitz, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is a partner at the firm.'
SPECIAL OFFER: Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and Google+ followers can get an online subscription to Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy for only $299. Click here, select Digital Only and use promo code MMLSOL299 at checkout. This offer is valid for new subscribers only.
'
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), each year one in every three “older adults” (65 years and older) falls. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Falls Among Older Adults: An Overview, available at http://1.usa.gov/19A97Zb. According to the CDC's report, in 2010, approximately 21,000 older adults died from unintentional fall injuries. The most common fall-related injuries were fractures of the spine, hip, forearm, leg, ankle, pelvis, upper arm, and hand.
Among older adults who sustain a hip fracture, studies show that nearly 50% never regain their previous level of functioning, while 30% die within six months. John Jorgensen, MPA, RN, Reducing Patient Falls: A Call to Action, Best Practices for Falls Reduction: A Practical Guide, Mar. 2011, p. 2.
In addition to the recovery and mortality problems falls create for older adults, these events carry significant costs. When adjusted for 2010 inflation, “falls among 'older adults' cost the U.S. health care system $30 billion in direct medical costs.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Costs of Falls Among Older Adults, available at http://1.usa.gov/19huwbH.
Since in-patient falls are avoidable, in 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) joined with the CDC to enact a new payment provision whereby Medicare and Medicaid would no longer reimburse hospitals when one of eight so-called “never events” during a hospital stay led to injury. Falls were included on that list of events that should never happen after a hospital admission. Consequently, hospitals would no longer receive payment by Medicare and Medicaid for treatment related to injuries caused by in-hospital falls. Jorgensen, supra at 2. CMS and others assert that that the initiative is a “strong incentive for healthcare providers to implement practices that reduce the number of preventable patient falls.” Jorgensen, supra at 2.
Efforts to increase health care quality and decrease costs are causing hospitals throughout the country to take steps to reduce the amount of inpatient falls by adopting fall-reduction programs. One of the first places hospitals turn to for guidance on establishing these programs is the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Accordingly, attorneys representing individuals who suffered injuries resulting from an in-hospital fall should also look to the Joint Commission in order to determine whether a hospital's fall-reduction program, protocols, or policies deviated from acceptable standards of care.'
The Joint Commission
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations is an independent, not-for-profit organization whose mission is to “continuously improve health care for the public ' by evaluating health care organizations and inspiring them to excel in providing safe and effective care of the highest quality and value.” The Joint Commission, About the Joint Commission, http://bit.ly/1aaLEi9. To gain accreditation, hospitals must allow on-site surveys to determine whether the hospital is in compliance with the Commission's current National Patient Safety Goals and Provisions of Car Standards.
According to the Commission, the purpose of the National Patient Safety Goals is to improve patient safety and focus on problems in health care safety and how to solve them. The Joint Commission, 2013 Hospital National Patient Safety Goals, http://bit.ly/17WV9Ei. Because these goals and standards are revised annually, it is important for hospitals that are seeking accreditation to ensure that their safety programs are up-to-date with any new requirements or compliance procedures.
National Patient Safety Goal 9
In 2005, the Joint Commission introduced a National Patient Safety Goal to help to reduce the risk of patient harm resulting from a fall. Jorgensen, supra, at 2. Dubbed National Patient Safety Goal 9, or NPSG 09.02.01, the goal consisted of two requirements: Requirement 9A and Requirement 9B. Joint Commission Resources: Special Report! 2005 Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals: Practical Strategies and Helpful Solutions for Meeting These Goals, http://bit.ly/15VzcHh. At the time the goal was introduced, hospitals seeking accreditation were only expected to comply with Requirement 9A, which stated that hospitals must “assess and periodically reassess each patient's risk for falling, including the potential risk associated with the patient's medication regimen, and take action to address any identified risks.”
Requirement 9B, which was only applicable to long-term care facilities at the time, required: 1) the implementation of a fall reduction program, “including a transfer protocol”; and 2) that the “the effectiveness of the program” be periodically evaluated. Special Report! 2005 Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals: Practical Strategies and Helpful Solutions for Meeting These Goals, http://bit.ly/1e915M7.
In addition to complying with Requirement 9A, in 2005, hospitals were also expected to regularly assess each patient's risk for falling by reviewing “risk factors such as previous history of falls, cognitive impairment, impaired balance or mobility, musculoskeletal problems, chronic diseases, nutritional problems, and use of multiple medications.” Id. At the time, the Commission also offered the following compliance “suggestions” as part of their risk reduction strategies:
Id.
Revisions and Additions
In 2006, the Commission revised National Patient Safety Goal 9 and expanded Requirement 9B so that it applied to hospitals. Joint Commission Resources: Joint Commission Perspectives on Patient Safety, Special Report! Helping Solutions for Meeting the 2006 National Patient Safety Goals, Vol. 5, Issue 8, August 2005, available at' http://bit.ly/19AaE1s. The Commission advised that a hospital's fall reduction program “should include an assessment process, risk reduction strategies, transfer protocols, in-services, involvement of patients/families in education, and evaluation of environment of care issues.” It also offered the following tips on compliance solutions:'
'Id.
In 2008, National Patient Safety Goal 9 was again revised to include the following “Implementation Expectations” under Requirement 9B: 1) The organization establishes a fall reduction program; 2) The fall reduction program includes an evaluation as appropriate to the patient population, settings, and services provided; 3) The fall reduction program includes interventions to reduce the [patient's] fall risk factors; 4) Staff receive education and training for the fall reduction program; 5) The [patient] and [patient's] family are educated on the fall reduction program and any individualized fall reduction strategies; and 6) The fall reduction program is evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the program.
2008 National Patient Safety Goals ' Joint Commission Resources, Joint Commission Perspectives, Vol. 27, Issue 7, p. 16 (July 2007).”
The Commission further advised that a hospital's evaluation of its fall program could include an evaluation of a patient's “fall history, medications and alcohol consumption review, gait and balance screening, walking aids, assistive technologies and protective device assessment, and environmental assessments.” Id.'
In 2010, NPSG 09.02.01 was upgraded from a National Patient Safety Goal in hospitals to a Provision of Care Standard. Jorgensen, supra, at 2. The Provision of Care Standards that address reducing the risk of patient harm resulting from falls in hospitals are as follows:
Joint Commission Requirement, Approved: 2010 National Patient Safety Goals, Joint Commission Perspectives, Vol. 29. Issue 10 (October 2010).
Conclusion
Attorneys representing clients who suffer injuries resulting from an in-hospital fall should familiarize themselves with the Joint Commission's Provision of Care Standards applicable to a patient's fall to ascertain whether a defendant hospital maintained a fall prevention program consistent with applicable standards of care. In addition, by arming themselves with the applicable compliance suggestions, expectations, and solutions offered by the Commission, attorneys will be prepared to propound valuable discovery demands and effectively question physicians, nurses, representatives of the hospital and experts during depositions.'
Robert Sanfilippo is an Associate at the Roseland, NJ, firm of
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.