Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

NJ's Offer of Judgment Rule

BY Gary L. Riveles
October 30, 2013

The Offer of Judgment Rule (the Rule) is a near universal concept that exists in most jurisdictions. Its intent is to foster settlement. However, in its current application, at least in New Jersey, it is ineffectual and pragmatically only available to plaintiffs. How did the rule come about, how was it changed over time, and is there a solution to its problems that will achieve the rules' desired goal ' settlement?

The Rule

New Jersey Court Rule (N.J. Ct. R.) 4:58-1. et seq., provides that any party may make an Offer of Judgment or an Offer to Take Judgment in an amount certain. (Rule 4:58 excepts matrimonial actions from the Offer of Judgment Rule. The Rule is available only when the relief sought in the complaint is exclusively monetary.) If the offer is not accepted, and the offeror secures a verdict 20% or more favorable to the offeror, cost and fee shifting from the date of the offer is triggered from the offeree to the offeror. (Application for fee and cost shifting must be made within 20 days after entry of final judgment.) There are no consequences to the offeror for making an offer, regardless of the outcome, and no consequences to the offeree if the 20% threshold is not reached.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Yachts, Jets, Horses & Hooch: Specialized Commercial Leasing Models Image

Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.

Hyperlinked Documents: The Latest e-Discovery Challenge Image

As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.

Identifying Your Practice's Differentiator Image

How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.

Risks and Ad Fraud Protection In Digital Advertising Image

The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.

Turning Business Development Plans Into Reality Image

This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.