Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cameo Clips

By Stan Soocher
November 02, 2013

Maryland Federal Court Issues Ruling in Dispute over Boxer Roberto Duran's Life Story

The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland decided that an agreement governed by Maryland law granting boxer Roberto Duran's rights of publicity to his manager could be enforceable, even though Maryland has not recognized such rights. JW & JJ Entertainment v. Sandler, 8:13-cv-01609. Duran entered into a management contract with Mark Sandler in 1995. The agreement in part gave Sandler “the exclusive right worldwide to use the name 'Roberto Duran' or any form thereof and any image or likeness of Duran in any form” and further stated that the boxer “expressly gives to Sandler the rights to Duran's life story.” Sandler later terminated the contract and in 1997 obtained a default judgment for breach of contract against Duran. In 2007, Duran granted “exclusive life story rights” to Compadre LLC, which latter transferred those rights to JW & JJ Entertainment. JW & JJ filed a declaratory suit regarding its rights after Sandler threatened to sue if JW & JJ continued production on a movie about Duran.

District Judge Alexander Williams Jr. wrote that whether “the Agreement validly gives Sandler Duran's movie rights does not require the Court to determine that the right to publicity, or a related right, exists at Maryland common law. ' [P]rivate parties have the right to enter into contracts that create benefits or burdens ' and allocate them among the parties thereto as they see fit.” But Judge Williams denied Sandler's motion to dismiss JW & JJ's claim that the story rights grant in the Duran-Sandler agreement wasn't exclusive. “[T]he Court is ruling on a Motion to Dismiss, and the Parties have yet to submit any such evidence. Therefore, construing Plaintiffs' Complaint in the most favorable light, Plaintiffs deserve the benefit of discovery regarding whether Duran gave Sandler exclusive rights to his life story,” the district judge noted.


New York Federal Court Refuses to Apply First-Filed Exception to Dispute Over “Bette Davis Eyes” Jewelry

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York declined to apply an exception to the first-filed rule that would have allowed an Indiana federal court to decide a legal dispute over “Bette Davis Eyes” jewelry that was earlier filed in New York federal court. Erickson Beamon Ltd. v. CMG Worldwide Inc., 12 Civ. 5105. In June 2012, the jewelry maker Erickson Beamon, which claimed its products were named after the Kim Carnes song “Bette Davis Eyes,” had filed for a declaratory judgment that it wasn't infringing the publicity or trademark rights of actress Bette Davis' estate. The estate's agent CMG Worldwide in turn sued Erickson Beamon in Indiana in November 2012, then moved to have the New York case dismissed.

Where there are concurrent cases in different jurisdictions, the first court in which a federal case is filed generally has first right to rule on the dispute. But New York federal District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald noted there is “an exception to the first-filed rule where declaratory actions are filed in response to demand letters that give specific warnings as to deadlines and subsequent legal action.” However, Judge Buchwald emphasized: “The [Sept.] 13, 2011 cease and desist letter sent to plaintiff [Erickson Beamon] by counsel for defendants [CMG and Bette Davis' estate] is insufficient, on its own, to warrant dismissal under the improper anticipatory action exception to the first-filed rule. That letter contained no specific warning of impending litigation, but rather threatened pursuit of other legal options in the most general terms.”

Maryland Federal Court Issues Ruling in Dispute over Boxer Roberto Duran's Life Story

The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland decided that an agreement governed by Maryland law granting boxer Roberto Duran's rights of publicity to his manager could be enforceable, even though Maryland has not recognized such rights. JW & JJ Entertainment v. Sandler, 8:13-cv-01609. Duran entered into a management contract with Mark Sandler in 1995. The agreement in part gave Sandler “the exclusive right worldwide to use the name 'Roberto Duran' or any form thereof and any image or likeness of Duran in any form” and further stated that the boxer “expressly gives to Sandler the rights to Duran's life story.” Sandler later terminated the contract and in 1997 obtained a default judgment for breach of contract against Duran. In 2007, Duran granted “exclusive life story rights” to Compadre LLC, which latter transferred those rights to JW & JJ Entertainment. JW & JJ filed a declaratory suit regarding its rights after Sandler threatened to sue if JW & JJ continued production on a movie about Duran.

District Judge Alexander Williams Jr. wrote that whether “the Agreement validly gives Sandler Duran's movie rights does not require the Court to determine that the right to publicity, or a related right, exists at Maryland common law. ' [P]rivate parties have the right to enter into contracts that create benefits or burdens ' and allocate them among the parties thereto as they see fit.” But Judge Williams denied Sandler's motion to dismiss JW & JJ's claim that the story rights grant in the Duran-Sandler agreement wasn't exclusive. “[T]he Court is ruling on a Motion to Dismiss, and the Parties have yet to submit any such evidence. Therefore, construing Plaintiffs' Complaint in the most favorable light, Plaintiffs deserve the benefit of discovery regarding whether Duran gave Sandler exclusive rights to his life story,” the district judge noted.


New York Federal Court Refuses to Apply First-Filed Exception to Dispute Over “Bette Davis Eyes” Jewelry

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York declined to apply an exception to the first-filed rule that would have allowed an Indiana federal court to decide a legal dispute over “Bette Davis Eyes” jewelry that was earlier filed in New York federal court. Erickson Beamon Ltd. v. CMG Worldwide Inc., 12 Civ. 5105. In June 2012, the jewelry maker Erickson Beamon, which claimed its products were named after the Kim Carnes song “Bette Davis Eyes,” had filed for a declaratory judgment that it wasn't infringing the publicity or trademark rights of actress Bette Davis' estate. The estate's agent CMG Worldwide in turn sued Erickson Beamon in Indiana in November 2012, then moved to have the New York case dismissed.

Where there are concurrent cases in different jurisdictions, the first court in which a federal case is filed generally has first right to rule on the dispute. But New York federal District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald noted there is “an exception to the first-filed rule where declaratory actions are filed in response to demand letters that give specific warnings as to deadlines and subsequent legal action.” However, Judge Buchwald emphasized: “The [Sept.] 13, 2011 cease and desist letter sent to plaintiff [Erickson Beamon] by counsel for defendants [CMG and Bette Davis' estate] is insufficient, on its own, to warrant dismissal under the improper anticipatory action exception to the first-filed rule. That letter contained no specific warning of impending litigation, but rather threatened pursuit of other legal options in the most general terms.”

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.