Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In September of last year, the America Invents Act (AIA) introduced a number of powerful tools for challenging the validity of an issued patent at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) ' Inter Partes Review (IPR), Covered Business Method Review (CBMR), and Post-Grant Review (PGR). Over the past year, these procedures have made the USPTO's Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) the third most active venue for patent litigation. By a large margin, however, the most popular of these procedures has been the IPR.
In their first year, IPR proceedings experienced widespread industry adoption with nearly 500 petitions being filed. If the increasing rate of these filings holds, twice that amount will be filed in the coming year. By adding a fast-tracked, trial-like invalidity proceeding before three technically savvy administrative law judges, the IPR procedure has altered the dynamics for challenging a patent's validity.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.