Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Software company Fortres Grand is pressing to revive its trademark infringement claims against Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. for using the name of the real-life “Clean Slate” computer program in the Batman movie The Dark Knight Rises. Lawyers for the security software maker, based in Plymouth, IN, have asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit to give the company a second chance in its fight against Warner Bros. Fortres Grand contends its sales of its software dropped in half after consumers mistakenly believed it was the same program mentioned in the 2012 Batman film.
In the trial court, Chief U.S. District Judge Philip Simon in the Northern District of Indiana dismissed Fortres Grand's claims as “implausible” because no one would believe the software maker had sponsored ' or had any connection to ' the Batman film. Fortres Grand Corp. v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., 3:12-cv-535. Fortres Grand attorney Phillip Barengolts said in an appellate brief filed in October 2013 that the drop in sales after the release of the movie confirmed “reverse confusion,” in which a larger use ' in this case, Warner Bros. ' “saturates the market with a trademark similar to or identical to that of a smaller, senior user.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.