Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In today's increasingly complex and fluid corporate world, insurers are routinely presented with claims from companies with no apparent connection to the insured named in the policy. These heretofore unknown companies nevertheless claim to be corporate successors to the original insured, and demand coverage under the policy. However, as discussed below, a corporate successor's right to coverage under a predecessor's policy is not a foregone conclusion. Rather, the outcome depends heavily on the specific circumstances of the corporate transaction, along with the particular jurisdiction and state law under which the question is posed. Thus, to protect against paying claims in error, an insurer's first line of defense is awareness of the issues.
Identifying these issues typically involves two questions. The first has to do with the underlying tort law: Will a successor corporation be held liable or responsible for harms that can be traced back to the products or conduct of an original corporation? The second question relates to insurance law: Assuming the successor corporation is held liable or responsible for the original corporation's products or conduct, can the successor corporation collect under insurance policies issued to the original insured?
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.