Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Years ago at a conference on the future of the legal profession, the presenters made three salient points. First, an increase in computers in law firms would wipe out the middle information processing people. Second, the law firm business model of “hours times rate equals the value of services delivered” would result in ineffective and inefficient service. And third, what the printing press did to the interpreters of the Bible, i.e., the clergy, the Internet and technology would do to the legal profession. This “Seize the Future” conference, which took place in 1997 and 1999, focused on 2015. Now, the tipping point of change for law firms has been reached.
A New Era
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.