Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the past, if you needed to secure documents or depose a witness outside of your jurisdiction, you had to secure something called a foreign commission. Essentially, one filed a motion in the state court to be permitted to conduct discovery outside of the state. The opposing parties could contest the motion, typically on the basis that the evidence was not relevant or was a mere fishing expedition. If the relief was granted, you next hired counsel in the jurisdiction where the evidence or witness was located. That attorney would file a miscellaneous action in the foreign court (“foreign” meaning outside state where the action is pending) specifying the needed discovery, indicating that the state where the action is pending approved pursuit of it and asking for leave to proceed in the other state. This action would be served on the witness or records custodian outside of the state. That person or entity had its own right to ask that the relief be denied. Again, most often, the basis would be lack of relevance.
The Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act (UIDDA) has been adopted by 31 states. The purpose is to streamline the old cumbersome procedure by making it a one-step process. For example, if you are a litigant in Pennsylvania and need evidence in New York, you will need to follow the New York statute and engage counsel in New York to take the discovery. But the “permission” part of the old foreign commission rules has been abandoned in states that have adopted the UIDDA.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.