Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Everyone, especially corporate leaders, got a little paranoid last year when National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden pulled the alarm on U.S. surveillance. See, “NSA Revelations Boost Corporate Paranoia About State Surveillance,” Financial Times, (registration req'd.). That paranoia turned into palpable risk after reports emerged of the NSA tapping the phones of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and executives at Brazilian oil company. See, “United States Tracked Merkel's Phone Since 2002: Report.”'
Now, European countries have committed to overhauling their archaic data protection standards to mitigate the risks of economic espionage, and plan to include provisions to protect consumer information.
The European Parliament's civil liberties committee voted to upgrade current standards to ensure laws are “up to the challenges of the digital age,” according to Bryan Glick for Computer Weekly. See, “MEPs Vote to Tighten Data Protection Rules After Internet Surveillance Revelations.”'
Although member states could water down the measure, Glick writes, the committee said it wants to send a clear signal that major change is needed. “The ball is now in the court of member state governments to agree [on] a position and start negotiations, so we can respond to citizens' interests and deliver an urgently needed update of EU data protection rules without delay,” Jan Albrecht of the European Parliament told Glick.
The committee has said companies will be required to obtain “clear permission” from individual consumers before sending their data overseas. The regulations also provide consumers with the right to have their personal data erased by any company that holds it, according to Glick. Noncompliant businesses could face fines of up to 100 million ($160.7 million USD) or up to 5% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is greater, the committee said in a statement.
Angela Hunt is a freelance writer based in New York City who writes for e-Commerce Law & Strategy's ALM sibling Law Technology News.
Everyone, especially corporate leaders, got a little paranoid last year when National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden pulled the alarm on U.S. surveillance. See, “NSA Revelations Boost Corporate Paranoia About State Surveillance,” Financial Times, (registration req'd.). That paranoia turned into palpable risk after reports emerged of the NSA tapping the phones of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and executives at Brazilian oil company. See, “United States Tracked Merkel's Phone Since 2002: Report.”'
Now, European countries have committed to overhauling their archaic data protection standards to mitigate the risks of economic espionage, and plan to include provisions to protect consumer information.
The European Parliament's civil liberties committee voted to upgrade current standards to ensure laws are “up to the challenges of the digital age,” according to Bryan Glick for Computer Weekly. See, “MEPs Vote to Tighten Data Protection Rules After Internet Surveillance Revelations.”'
Although member states could water down the measure, Glick writes, the committee said it wants to send a clear signal that major change is needed. “The ball is now in the court of member state governments to agree [on] a position and start negotiations, so we can respond to citizens' interests and deliver an urgently needed update of EU data protection rules without delay,” Jan Albrecht of the European Parliament told Glick.
The committee has said companies will be required to obtain “clear permission” from individual consumers before sending their data overseas. The regulations also provide consumers with the right to have their personal data erased by any company that holds it, according to Glick. Noncompliant businesses could face fines of up to 100 million ($160.7 million USD) or up to 5% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is greater, the committee said in a statement.
Angela Hunt is a freelance writer based in
GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.