Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Oliver Wendell Holmes once wrote that “it would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained only to the law to constitute themselves final judges of the worth of pictorial illustrations.” Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. , 188 U.S. 239, 251 (1903). If Holmes didn't think he could do it, which of us thinks we're up to the task? Nonetheless, this was just the challenge taken up by Judge Block of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in Cohen v. G&M Realty L.P., No. 13-CV-5612, 2013 WL 6172732 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 2013).
Plaintiff graffiti artists sought a preliminary injunction to prevent the destruction of several warehouses in Queens that bore their work. In a case of first impression, the court had to determine whether graffiti art could achieve the “recognized stature” necessary to obtain protection under the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA), 17 U.S.C. '106A. Unable to satisfactorily apply the “recognized stature” standard, the court ultimately denied the preliminary injunction on other grounds, showcasing the difficulty of applying legal standards to aesthetic judgments.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.