Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cyber-Harassment Bill Clears NJ Senate Committee

By Michael Booth
December 31, 2013

A New Jersey Senate committee has signed off on legislation that would strengthen criminal penalties for harassment or bullying over the Internet.

The Budget and Appropriations Committee passed the bill, S-2469, in a 10-0 vote on Dec. 5. The Law and Public Safety Committee had recommended passage in June.

The measure, sponsored by Sens. David Norcross (D-Camden) and Nicholas Sacco (D-Hudson), now goes to the full Senate for consideration.

It defines the crime of cyber-harassment as knowingly making online threats with the intent to injure or harm a person or damage that person's property; sending or posting any lewd, indecent or obscene material to or about a person; or threatening to commit a crime against a person or his or her property.

Violators would be guilty of a fourth-degree crime, which carries a prison sentence of up to 18 months and a fine of up to $10,000.

The crime would be elevated to third-degree ' carrying a 3- to 5-year prison sentence and a fine of up to $15,000 ' if the offender is 21 or older and impersonates a minor.

Minors under 16 adjudicated as delinquent for cyber-harassment could be ordered to complete a class or training program intended to reduce the tendency toward such behavior or a program designed to bring awareness to the dangers associated with cyber-harassment.

The juvenile's parent or guardian could be ordered to attend the class or program, and failure to do so would be a disorderly persons offense, carrying a fine of up to $25 for a first offense and up to $100 for each subsequent offense.

The impetus for the bill is the October 2006 suicide of Megan Meier, a 13-year-old Missouri girl who killed herself after she was the target of a Myspace harassment campaign conducted by the mother of one of her former friends.

New Jersey, like Missouri at the time, has no law against Internet harassment or bullying beyond the disorderly persons offense of harassment. There is a “gaping hole” in the criminal code, Russell DePersia, a Camden lawyer who is pushing for the bill, testified during the Senate Law and Public Safety Committee hearing in June.

The American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education oppose the bill on First Amendment grounds. “[F]reedom of speech cannot be sacrificed by a state government in this manner,” says one FIRE commentator. Students 'and citizens ' do not have a right to never be uncomfortable, or to be shielded from ideas or statements that they find merely annoying or alarming.”

The bill had been referred to the budget committee because of the possible costs of incarcerating violators. The Office of Legislative Services says costs cannot be quantified because the number of offenders cannot be predicted.


Michael Booth is the Trenton Bureau Chief for the New Jersey Law Journal.

A New Jersey Senate committee has signed off on legislation that would strengthen criminal penalties for harassment or bullying over the Internet.

The Budget and Appropriations Committee passed the bill, S-2469, in a 10-0 vote on Dec. 5. The Law and Public Safety Committee had recommended passage in June.

The measure, sponsored by Sens. David Norcross (D-Camden) and Nicholas Sacco (D-Hudson), now goes to the full Senate for consideration.

It defines the crime of cyber-harassment as knowingly making online threats with the intent to injure or harm a person or damage that person's property; sending or posting any lewd, indecent or obscene material to or about a person; or threatening to commit a crime against a person or his or her property.

Violators would be guilty of a fourth-degree crime, which carries a prison sentence of up to 18 months and a fine of up to $10,000.

The crime would be elevated to third-degree ' carrying a 3- to 5-year prison sentence and a fine of up to $15,000 ' if the offender is 21 or older and impersonates a minor.

Minors under 16 adjudicated as delinquent for cyber-harassment could be ordered to complete a class or training program intended to reduce the tendency toward such behavior or a program designed to bring awareness to the dangers associated with cyber-harassment.

The juvenile's parent or guardian could be ordered to attend the class or program, and failure to do so would be a disorderly persons offense, carrying a fine of up to $25 for a first offense and up to $100 for each subsequent offense.

The impetus for the bill is the October 2006 suicide of Megan Meier, a 13-year-old Missouri girl who killed herself after she was the target of a Myspace harassment campaign conducted by the mother of one of her former friends.

New Jersey, like Missouri at the time, has no law against Internet harassment or bullying beyond the disorderly persons offense of harassment. There is a “gaping hole” in the criminal code, Russell DePersia, a Camden lawyer who is pushing for the bill, testified during the Senate Law and Public Safety Committee hearing in June.

The American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education oppose the bill on First Amendment grounds. “[F]reedom of speech cannot be sacrificed by a state government in this manner,” says one FIRE commentator. Students 'and citizens ' do not have a right to never be uncomfortable, or to be shielded from ideas or statements that they find merely annoying or alarming.”

The bill had been referred to the budget committee because of the possible costs of incarcerating violators. The Office of Legislative Services says costs cannot be quantified because the number of offenders cannot be predicted.


Michael Booth is the Trenton Bureau Chief for the New Jersey Law Journal.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.