Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Prior Agreement Bars Termination of Song Rights

By Brendan Pierson
December 31, 2013

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that music publisher EMI can keep the rights to the 1934 hit song “Santa Claus Is Coming to Town” for another 25 years. Baldwin v. EMI Feist Catalog Inc., 12-cv-09360. Family members of co-songwriter John Frederick Coots sued EMI in 2011 after repeatedly serving notices that they were terminating their copyright agreement with EMI under provisions of the Copyright Act of 1976. Coots had served such a notice in 1981 and was able to get a $100,000 bonus in exchange for extending his copyright assignment to EMI's predecessor Leo Feist Inc.

The key issue in the dispute was whether the 1981 agreement superseded an earlier 1951 agreement. If it did, then the Copyright Act would give the plaintiffs the right to terminate the agreement. If it didn't, the 1951 agreement would remain in effect until 2029. District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin found that the 1951 agreement remained in effect because the parties did not properly record the 1981 agreement with the Copyright Office.

' Brendan Pierson, New York Law Journal

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?