Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Prior Agreement Bars Termination of Song Rights

By Brendan Pierson
December 31, 2013

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that music publisher EMI can keep the rights to the 1934 hit song “Santa Claus Is Coming to Town” for another 25 years. Baldwin v. EMI Feist Catalog Inc., 12-cv-09360. Family members of co-songwriter John Frederick Coots sued EMI in 2011 after repeatedly serving notices that they were terminating their copyright agreement with EMI under provisions of the Copyright Act of 1976. Coots had served such a notice in 1981 and was able to get a $100,000 bonus in exchange for extending his copyright assignment to EMI's predecessor Leo Feist Inc.

The key issue in the dispute was whether the 1981 agreement superseded an earlier 1951 agreement. If it did, then the Copyright Act would give the plaintiffs the right to terminate the agreement. If it didn't, the 1951 agreement would remain in effect until 2029. District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin found that the 1951 agreement remained in effect because the parties did not properly record the 1981 agreement with the Copyright Office.

' Brendan Pierson, New York Law Journal

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that music publisher EMI can keep the rights to the 1934 hit song “Santa Claus Is Coming to Town” for another 25 years. Baldwin v. EMI Feist Catalog Inc., 12-cv-09360. Family members of co-songwriter John Frederick Coots sued EMI in 2011 after repeatedly serving notices that they were terminating their copyright agreement with EMI under provisions of the Copyright Act of 1976. Coots had served such a notice in 1981 and was able to get a $100,000 bonus in exchange for extending his copyright assignment to EMI's predecessor Leo Feist Inc.

The key issue in the dispute was whether the 1981 agreement superseded an earlier 1951 agreement. If it did, then the Copyright Act would give the plaintiffs the right to terminate the agreement. If it didn't, the 1951 agreement would remain in effect until 2029. District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin found that the 1951 agreement remained in effect because the parties did not properly record the 1981 agreement with the Copyright Office.

' Brendan Pierson, New York Law Journal

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.