Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Seveth Circuit Upholds Cracker Barrel Injunction

By Judith L. Grubner
December 31, 2013

Kraft Foods is well known for its packaged cheeses sold in grocery stores, including its more than 50-year-old Cracker Barrel line. Kraft only uses its Cracker Barrel trademark for cheese.

Over 16,000 grocery and other retail stores carry Kraft's Cracker Barrel cheeses. Kraft has co-existed for 44 years with the well-known chain of low-price restaurants known as Cracker Barrel Old Country Stores (CBOCS). CBOCS, with over 620 restaurants, many along major highways, sells packaged food products such as ham, delicatessen meats, bacon, sausages, jerky, meat glazes, baking mixes, coating mixes, oatmeal, grits and gravies in its restaurants, small adjoining “country stores,” by mail order and online.

When CBOCS decided to introduce its non-cheese products into grocery stores (starting with packaged spiral ham) under a logo with “Cracker Barrel” appearing more prominently than “Old Country Store,” Kraft sued for trademark infringement and sought a preliminary injunction. The parties conducted extensive discovery and presented expert evidence (including consumer surveys), as well as live witnesses. Kraft argued that many consumers would be confused by the similar logos and, believing that the CBOCS products came from Kraft, would blame Kraft if they were dissatisfied with CBOCS' products. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted Kraft a preliminary injunction, halting sale of the CBOCS ham in grocery stores until the conclusion of the case.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.