Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Is a Foreign Debtor with No Assets in the U.S. Eligible for Chapter 15 Relief?

By Russell C. Silberglied and L. Katherine Good
January 28, 2014

Does Section 109(a)'s requirement that “only a person that resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States ' may be a debtor under this title” apply to foreign debtors in Chapter 15 proceedings? The Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware addressed this novel issue in December and came to opposite conclusions. In Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund LP v. Barnet (In re Barnet), 737 F.3d 238 (2d Cir. 2013), the Second Circuit held that Section 109(a)'s eligibility requirements apply in Chapter 15 proceedings, and therefore vacated an order of recognition. Less than one week later, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in In re Bemarmara Consulting a.s., Case No. 13-13037 (KG) (Bankr. D. Del. Dec. 17, 2013) (Transcript; “Tr.”) issued an oral ruling, holding that Section 109(a)'s requirements do not apply in Chapter 15 proceedings, and granting recognition to a debtor that an objector argued had no assets in the United States.

This article first sets forth the statutory provisions that led to the differing results in Barnet and Bemarmara and then explores the reasoning of the two opinions. It concludes with practical observations about the desirability and availability of Chapter 15 relief for companies without significant assets located in the United States.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.