Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Federal Circuit Limits ITC's Indirect Patent Infringement Authority
On Dec. 13, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in Suprema, Inc., et al. v. International Trade Commission, issued a landmark decision limiting the statutory authority of the International Trade Commission (ITC) to remedy indirect infringement, holding “that an exclusion order based on a violation of 19 U.S.C. '1337(a)(1)(B)(i) may not be predicated on a theory of induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. '271(b) where direct infringement does not occur until after importation of the articles the exclusion order would bar.” Suprema, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, ___ F.3d ___ 2013 WL 6510929, *1 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2013) (emphasis in original). The Federal Circuit's holding effectively renders patent infringement claims based purely on alleged inducement of infringement beyond the authority of the ITC.
The ITC Investigation
In the underlying ITC Investigation (Certain Biometric Scanning Devices, Components Thereof, Associated Software, and Products Containing Same, U.S.I.T.C. Inv. No. 337-TA-720), the Complainant, Florida-based Cross Match Technologies, Inc. (Cross Match), alleged that biometric (fingerprint) scanners sold by Respondent Suprema, Inc. of South Korea (Suprema) infringed Cross Match's '344 patent related to fingerprint scanning technology when combined with software created by fellow Respondent Mentalix, Inc. of Plano, TX (Mentalix). Suprema sold its fingerprint scanners in the United States through distributors such as Texas-based Mentalix, which packaged the scanners with a general purpose computer and fingerprint scanning software for sale to end customers. Suprema did not provide executable end-user software, but did provide a Software Development Kit (SDK) that allowed its customers and distributors to create their own software to operate the scanner. Suprema's scanners, as well as its SDK ' the only “articles” that were actually imported ' were found not to infringe the '344 patent when combined with software developed by other customers. Hence, the ITC concluded these items had substantial non-infringing uses, and did not contributorily or directly infringe. After a hearing and post-hearing briefing, the ITC found infringement of the '344 patent as to Suprema, solely on the basis of inducement of infringement, where the claimed direct infringement took place only after importation into the U.S. Based on this finding, the ITC issued a limited exclusion order.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Yachts, Jets, Horses & Hooch: Specialized Commercial Leasing Models
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
Hyperlinked Documents: The Latest e-Discovery Challenge
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
Identifying Your Practice's Differentiator
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
Risks and Ad Fraud Protection In Digital Advertising
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
Turning Business Development Plans Into Reality
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.