Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Recognition, Not Relitigation
If there were a James Bond movie featuring only lawyers, this might be it: SNP Boat Service, S.A. v. Hotel Le St. James, 483 B.R. 776 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2012). It begins in the south of France with a company that builds and designs luxury yachts. As part of a business deal, the company agrees to accept a trade-in yacht from a Canadian company 5,000 miles across the Atlantic. Unfortunately the deal results in a nasty contract dispute. The French sue the Canadians in France. The Canadians sue the French in Canada. The Canadians get a default judgment in Canada first and promptly start looking for assets to collect. They learn of two yachts owned by the French company that are berthed ' now enter a third country ' in the United States, several thousand miles south in Fort Lauderdale, FL. The Canadians head for Florida and promptly domesticate their judgment in the local Broward County court. Armed with a writ of execution from the court, the Broward county sheriff seizes the French boats for the Canadians.
But the French have an ace up their sleeve. Several months earlier, and before the Canadians had sued them, the French courts had approved a sauvegarde proceeding for the boat company. Such a proceeding is similar to an American Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in that the goal of a sauvegarde (literally “safeguard”) is to allow the debtor to negotiate its debts while continuing to operate. Important for the French boat company, a sauvegarde proceeding also provides for an international automatic stay of all legal proceedings against the debtor. The French court-appointed administrator overseeing the boat company's sauvegarde knows that this stay should apply to any enforcement actions against the yachts in Florida. The administrator also wants control over the yachts because they are assets of the company that he is helping to reorganize.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.