Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Death Benefit Only (DBO) program provides non-qualified deferred compensation, and death benefits. The DBO program can be used by employers without regard to corporate and qualified plan limitations and may be provided by employers on a permissibly discriminatory basis. The DBO program, when structured properly, can accept elective or non-elective contributions on an individual employee basis. The benefits can also be used as Golden Handcuffs to retain valued employees.
Structure of the DBO Program
The DBO Program' can be applied to an existing deferred compensation plan as well as new wealth accumulation plan. This approach will be flexible to the employer and largely estate- and income-tax free to the covered employee. The accrued benefit to the employee can be safeguarded from claims of creditors of the employer and employees and upon withdrawal by the employee can be accessed in an economically efficient manner. The death benefit need not be an asset on the books of the practice or subject to the claims of creditors. Additionally, the employer can institute The DBO Program as a new benefit plan and fund “as you go” rather than creating a liability for employer needs. The DBO Program alternatively, may be reflected as an asset on the practice's books for audit accounting purposes and not create a charge to earnings. This tool complies with both GAAP accounting as well as IAS 19.
Limitations of the DBO Program
Because this has a death benefit component, there is no maximum limitation of death benefits or asset accumulation. IRC Section 457(f)(2)(iii) (1986). The program provides a current death benefit for covered employees. This is an actuarial-based structure for an employer that maximizes the benefits to the employer while providing a selective benefits program for qualifying employees. This creates a versatile tool that is ideal for Golden Handcuffs, employment contracts, funds to help offset future employer financial' obligations and covenants not to compete. The employer may use this tool in transactions'to reduce the cost of funding employee or share-holder buy outs or future compensation packages. The employer may fund the executive benefit providing the same amount of funding and the selected employees will receive more benefit than the traditional deferred compensation method or the employee will reduce the amount of funding and the selected employees will receive equivalent benefit. The DBO Program also avoids the Golden Parachute limitations and excise tax. Unlike the 457(f) rules, there is no immediate taxation upon termination of risk of forfeiture, and properly designed, income and estate taxes may be totally avoided. Also unlike the traditional benefit plans that have a substantial risk of forfeiture of '457(f), '409A or '83, The DBO Program has no contribution limitation. The arrangement also avoids the risk of forfeiture tests. The benefit program complies with the most recent legislative rules IRC '101(j), COLI Best Practices Act of 2005 and as an exception under '72(k)(2)(B)(ii) and the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 IRC '409A and Notice 2005-1.
How The DBO Program Works
The DBO Program is based on well-established death benefit, economic benefit and constructive receipt rules successfully utilized since the early 1960s. It complies with all proposed regulatory rules, and the tax shelter rules as presented which further assures positive results. The arrangement is not a tax shelter, a listed transaction or a reportable transaction. The arrangement complies with the economic substance test as proposed in Congress as well as set forth in case law and proposed legislation. The employer's contribution is actuarially determined and that amount is deductible. (Sec. 79, Treas.Reg 1.162.10 TAM 200002047 and 20050204). The employer can utilize a current death benefit arrangement with an employment or non-competition agreement to provide benefits that may reduce income and estate tax to the employee. This arrangement complies with the deferred compensation rules of ' 409A because it is a death benefit plan qualifying under 31.3121(v)(2)-1(b)(4)(iv)(A). The IRS announced in the proposed regulations that Code ' 83 is applicable to an insurance arrangement between an employer and a participant. According to the regulations, not only is the value of current annual life insurance protection (Table I below) includible as taxable compensation to the insured participant each year but, in addition, in line with Rev. Proc. 2003-25 and Section 72, the cash surrender value of the policy would not be subject to income tax nor be a reportable event if the policy is not surrendered. This is further in line with Reg. 105885-99. The flow chart below'demonstrates how The DBO Program works.
Implementing the DBO Program
See Table 1'below for an example of implementing The DBO Program.
Conclusion
This approach will comply on both a legal and accounting basis and may be a tremendous economic solution to this funding and compliance situation. In addition, this tool will allow the employer to retain equity within the business and relieve the employees from having to use personal assets to fund current death benefits and financial obligations. See the sidebar, “Planning Opportunity,” below, for a real-life example of The DBO Program.
Planning Opportunity Car Dealer 52 Death Benefit Only Plan
1. Principal (CD52) owns Car Dealership (ER) ' operating company wants to:
2. ER enters into an agreement to provide death benefits for its employees. Administrative agreement between ER & Advisors, LLC.
3. Advisors LLC annually obtains value of costs of death benefit life segment. An executive carve out plan as allowed under TAM200002047 integrates permanent and current coverage. Valuation is based on death benefits as permitted under '3131.21. Face amount of death benefit for HCE CD52es ($5 MM) not exceed face amount for Rank and file (50RF = $100K GTL). We can have spouse be the employee.
4. ER deducts the amount actuarially determined using the stable value $225K.
5. Bonus out the other $25K to CD52, tax $10K annually. Moves $2.5MM over 10 years. Total tax cost = $100K.
6. Table I tax CD52 $13,524, offset by supplemental funding of $25K + no tax on Table I.
7. GB pulls out $274K annually over 20 yrs. Total = $5.491M tax free.
8. COLI Best Practices are followed because employees name beneficiary as long as employed.
9. '409A and Notice 2005-01 Final 409 A regs TD 9321 exempt death benefit only plans under 31.3121.
10. Asset acts like COLI product for tax advantaged build up and possible tax-free distributions.
[IMGCAP(1)]
[IMGCAP(2)]
Lawrence L. Bell, JD, LTM, CLU, ChFC, CFP', AEP, has served as Tax Bar liaison to the IRS for 10 years. He has received patents in actuarial product fields dealing with COLI, GASB, FASB, IASB and OPEB solutions. He writes articles and speaks nationally about Decision Trees on COLI Best Practices, 409A and Benefit Planning.
The Death Benefit Only (DBO) program provides non-qualified deferred compensation, and death benefits. The DBO program can be used by employers without regard to corporate and qualified plan limitations and may be provided by employers on a permissibly discriminatory basis. The DBO program, when structured properly, can accept elective or non-elective contributions on an individual employee basis. The benefits can also be used as Golden Handcuffs to retain valued employees.
Structure of the DBO Program
The DBO Program' can be applied to an existing deferred compensation plan as well as new wealth accumulation plan. This approach will be flexible to the employer and largely estate- and income-tax free to the covered employee. The accrued benefit to the employee can be safeguarded from claims of creditors of the employer and employees and upon withdrawal by the employee can be accessed in an economically efficient manner. The death benefit need not be an asset on the books of the practice or subject to the claims of creditors. Additionally, the employer can institute The DBO Program as a new benefit plan and fund “as you go” rather than creating a liability for employer needs. The DBO Program alternatively, may be reflected as an asset on the practice's books for audit accounting purposes and not create a charge to earnings. This tool complies with both GAAP accounting as well as IAS 19.
Limitations of the DBO Program
Because this has a death benefit component, there is no maximum limitation of death benefits or asset accumulation. IRC Section 457(f)(2)(iii) (1986). The program provides a current death benefit for covered employees. This is an actuarial-based structure for an employer that maximizes the benefits to the employer while providing a selective benefits program for qualifying employees. This creates a versatile tool that is ideal for Golden Handcuffs, employment contracts, funds to help offset future employer financial' obligations and covenants not to compete. The employer may use this tool in transactions'to reduce the cost of funding employee or share-holder buy outs or future compensation packages. The employer may fund the executive benefit providing the same amount of funding and the selected employees will receive more benefit than the traditional deferred compensation method or the employee will reduce the amount of funding and the selected employees will receive equivalent benefit. The DBO Program also avoids the Golden Parachute limitations and excise tax. Unlike the 457(f) rules, there is no immediate taxation upon termination of risk of forfeiture, and properly designed, income and estate taxes may be totally avoided. Also unlike the traditional benefit plans that have a substantial risk of forfeiture of '457(f), '409A or '83, The DBO Program has no contribution limitation. The arrangement also avoids the risk of forfeiture tests. The benefit program complies with the most recent legislative rules IRC '101(j), COLI Best Practices Act of 2005 and as an exception under '72(k)(2)(B)(ii) and the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 IRC '409A and Notice 2005-1.
How The DBO Program Works
The DBO Program is based on well-established death benefit, economic benefit and constructive receipt rules successfully utilized since the early 1960s. It complies with all proposed regulatory rules, and the tax shelter rules as presented which further assures positive results. The arrangement is not a tax shelter, a listed transaction or a reportable transaction. The arrangement complies with the economic substance test as proposed in Congress as well as set forth in case law and proposed legislation. The employer's contribution is actuarially determined and that amount is deductible. (Sec. 79, Treas.Reg 1.162.10 TAM 200002047 and 20050204). The employer can utilize a current death benefit arrangement with an employment or non-competition agreement to provide benefits that may reduce income and estate tax to the employee. This arrangement complies with the deferred compensation rules of ' 409A because it is a death benefit plan qualifying under 31.3121(v)(2)-1(b)(4)(iv)(A). The IRS announced in the proposed regulations that Code ' 83 is applicable to an insurance arrangement between an employer and a participant. According to the regulations, not only is the value of current annual life insurance protection (Table I below) includible as taxable compensation to the insured participant each year but, in addition, in line with Rev. Proc. 2003-25 and Section 72, the cash surrender value of the policy would not be subject to income tax nor be a reportable event if the policy is not surrendered. This is further in line with Reg. 105885-99. The flow chart below'demonstrates how The DBO Program works.
Implementing the DBO Program
See Table 1'below for an example of implementing The DBO Program.
Conclusion
This approach will comply on both a legal and accounting basis and may be a tremendous economic solution to this funding and compliance situation. In addition, this tool will allow the employer to retain equity within the business and relieve the employees from having to use personal assets to fund current death benefits and financial obligations. See the sidebar, “Planning Opportunity,” below, for a real-life example of The DBO Program.
Planning Opportunity Car Dealer 52 Death Benefit Only Plan
1. Principal (CD52) owns Car Dealership (ER) ' operating company wants to:
2. ER enters into an agreement to provide death benefits for its employees. Administrative agreement between ER & Advisors, LLC.
3. Advisors LLC annually obtains value of costs of death benefit life segment. An executive carve out plan as allowed under TAM200002047 integrates permanent and current coverage. Valuation is based on death benefits as permitted under '3131.21. Face amount of death benefit for HCE CD52es ($5 MM) not exceed face amount for Rank and file (50RF = $100K GTL). We can have spouse be the employee.
4. ER deducts the amount actuarially determined using the stable value $225K.
5. Bonus out the other $25K to CD52, tax $10K annually. Moves $2.5MM over 10 years. Total tax cost = $100K.
6. Table I tax CD52 $13,524, offset by supplemental funding of $25K + no tax on Table I.
7. GB pulls out $274K annually over 20 yrs. Total = $5.491M tax free.
8. COLI Best Practices are followed because employees name beneficiary as long as employed.
9. '409A and Notice 2005-01 Final 409 A regs TD 9321 exempt death benefit only plans under 31.3121.
10. Asset acts like COLI product for tax advantaged build up and possible tax-free distributions.
[IMGCAP(1)]
[IMGCAP(2)]
Lawrence L. Bell, JD, LTM, CLU, ChFC, CFP', AEP, has served as Tax Bar liaison to the IRS for 10 years. He has received patents in actuarial product fields dealing with COLI, GASB, FASB, IASB and OPEB solutions. He writes articles and speaks nationally about Decision Trees on COLI Best Practices, 409A and Benefit Planning.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.