Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The importance of the use of the premises to both the landlord and the tenant cannot be sufficiently stressed. In order to carry on its business, the tenant wants to sell the broadest possible scope of merchandise that is currently in vogue or (in the tenant's opinion) will be. The landlord, however, wants the use clause specifically limited, not only to avoid any overlap of uses among the tenants in its shopping center, but also to avoid violating any restrictive covenant (i.e., a covenant the landlord has given to a tenant whereby that tenant, and no other tenant, has the exclusive right to sell a specific item or items in the shopping centre) given to any other tenant. In addition, the landlord wants a narrow clause because the use clause will also govern the use of the premises in the event of an assignment of the lease or a sublease of the premises (unless the landlord and the tenant mutually agree to a change in the use clause), which, of course, is important in the event the tenant wishes to sell the business.
In today's changing times, there is difficulty first in determining what the store is and, second, attempting to define what it sells. For example, today's drug stores, in many instances, are becoming large variety stores with a pharmacy; variety stores are becoming junior department stores; junior department stores are becoming department stores; and supermarkets are becoming combination food and general merchandise stores. In addition, the concept of hybrid retailing has emerged. A hybrid retail tenant sells in its premises goods that are entirely unrelated to one another (such as food and clothing) ' which makes it that much more difficult for a landlord to preserve its tenant-mix in the center.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.