Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<i>Online Extra</i>Cost of Target Data Breach: $61M ' So Far

By Andrew Ramonas
February 27, 2014

The recent massive data breach at Target Corp. so far has saddled the retail giant with a $61 million tab ' one that could rise in the future, the company said on Feb. 26.

An insurance payment left Target with only $17 million of net expenses from legal assistance, identity-theft protection and other services the company procured after the personal information of as many as 110 million customers was exposed to hackers during the holiday shopping season last year. But in its fourth-quarter earnings report, the Minneapolis-based retailer braced investors for the potential of more costs to come from the cyberattack.

Target didn't estimate future breach expenses. The company, however, said the breach could have a “material adverse effect” on its results of operations in the following months and years. Its future costs could include expenses from litigation, government investigations and card reissuance, the retailer said.

Target's Q4 report, which was the first such report since the retailer acknowledged the breach on Dec. 19, showed that the company posted a net profit of $520 million, a 46% drop from 2012.

Gregg Steinhafel, Target's chairman, president and chief executive officer, said in a written statement that “results softened meaningfully” after the digital attack became public.

“As we plan for the new fiscal year, we will continue to work tirelessly to win back the confidence of our guests and deliver irresistible merchandise and offers, and we are encouraged that sales trends have improved in recent weeks,” he said.

Target's earnings report came a week after'the Credit Union National Association and Consumer Bankers Association reported'that its members racked up more than $200 million on replacing payment cards after the data breach. The trade groups didn't estimate money spent on addressing fraudulent activity, but adding in those expenses would make the total cost of the cyberattack “much higher,” according to the associations.


Andrew Ramonas'writes for'Corporate Counsel, an ALM sibling of'e-Commerce Law & Strategy.

The recent massive data breach at Target Corp. so far has saddled the retail giant with a $61 million tab ' one that could rise in the future, the company said on Feb. 26.

An insurance payment left Target with only $17 million of net expenses from legal assistance, identity-theft protection and other services the company procured after the personal information of as many as 110 million customers was exposed to hackers during the holiday shopping season last year. But in its fourth-quarter earnings report, the Minneapolis-based retailer braced investors for the potential of more costs to come from the cyberattack.

Target didn't estimate future breach expenses. The company, however, said the breach could have a “material adverse effect” on its results of operations in the following months and years. Its future costs could include expenses from litigation, government investigations and card reissuance, the retailer said.

Target's Q4 report, which was the first such report since the retailer acknowledged the breach on Dec. 19, showed that the company posted a net profit of $520 million, a 46% drop from 2012.

Gregg Steinhafel, Target's chairman, president and chief executive officer, said in a written statement that “results softened meaningfully” after the digital attack became public.

“As we plan for the new fiscal year, we will continue to work tirelessly to win back the confidence of our guests and deliver irresistible merchandise and offers, and we are encouraged that sales trends have improved in recent weeks,” he said.

Target's earnings report came a week after'the Credit Union National Association and Consumer Bankers Association reported'that its members racked up more than $200 million on replacing payment cards after the data breach. The trade groups didn't estimate money spent on addressing fraudulent activity, but adding in those expenses would make the total cost of the cyberattack “much higher,” according to the associations.


Andrew Ramonas'writes for'Corporate Counsel, an ALM sibling of'e-Commerce Law & Strategy.

Read These Next
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

Generative AI and the 2024 Elections: Risks, Realities, and Lessons for Businesses Image

GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.