Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Product Liability Law & StrategyLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Practice Tip: Personal Jurisdiction from Abroad

By Thomas E. Riley and Garrett S. Kamen
February 27, 2014

Manufacturers based outside the United States often sell goods through a U.S.-based distributor, rather than selling products directly to consumers. Thus, the manufacturer's only connection in the United States may be with a single American distributor, located in a single state, which sells the manufacturer's goods throughout the country.'When a consumer is injured and seeks to recover damages from the manufacturer, can the consumer's home state exercise jurisdiction over the manufacturer?'

The answer is unsettled, and U.S. courts have adopted divergent analyses on this basic question. Some U.S. courts have exercised jurisdiction over a foreign manufacturer based on its introduction of the product into the “stream of commerce,” but others have refused to do so unless the manufacturer is engaged in activity specifically targeted at the forum state. (See James Rotondo, “Daimler AG v. Bauman,” http://bit.ly/1jbHyQz.) Far from helping to clarify the standards to be applied, the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions have added to this uncertainty, prompting one court to comment recently that this “particular theory of personal jurisdiction has been the subject of much debate, and little consensus, throughout the United States, including in the Supreme Court.” Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd., 2013 WL 2367809 (D. Mass. May 28, 2013).

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.