Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Practice Tip: Personal Jurisdiction from Abroad

By Thomas E. Riley and Garrett S. Kamen

Manufacturers based outside the United States often sell goods through a U.S.-based distributor, rather than selling products directly to consumers. Thus, the manufacturer's only connection in the United States may be with a single American distributor, located in a single state, which sells the manufacturer's goods throughout the country.'When a consumer is injured and seeks to recover damages from the manufacturer, can the consumer's home state exercise jurisdiction over the manufacturer?'

The answer is unsettled, and U.S. courts have adopted divergent analyses on this basic question. Some U.S. courts have exercised jurisdiction over a foreign manufacturer based on its introduction of the product into the “stream of commerce,” but others have refused to do so unless the manufacturer is engaged in activity specifically targeted at the forum state. (See James Rotondo, “Daimler AG v. Bauman,http://bit.ly/1jbHyQz.) Far from helping to clarify the standards to be applied, the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions have added to this uncertainty, prompting one court to comment recently that this “particular theory of personal jurisdiction has been the subject of much debate, and little consensus, throughout the United States, including in the Supreme Court.” Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd., 2013 WL 2367809 (D. Mass. May 28, 2013).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.