Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Limitations Period Bars Claim to Monies From Photos of Robert Johnson
The Supreme Court of Mississippi decided that the estate of the sister of blues legend Robert Johnson waited too long to file suit to obtain royalties and fees from two rare photos of Johnson. Anderson v. LaVere, 2012-CA-00601. Johnson died in 1938. In 1974, his half-sister Carrie Thompson entered into an agency agreement for music producer Steven LaVere to exploit Johnson content. LaVere then procured a deal with CBS Records, today owned by Sony Music. When Thompson died in 1983, she left her estate to her half-sister Annye Anderson and grandson Robert Harris. In 1990, CBS released The Complete Recordings of Robert Johnson, which included the two photos in the packaging. In 1991, a state judge appointed an administrator for Robert Johnson's estate and, in 1998, the Mississippi Chancery Court ruled that Johnson's son Claud was sole heir of the blues artist's estate.
Anderson and Harris sued Johnson, LaVere and Sony Music in 2000 over monies earned from the photos. The causes of action included fraud, unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty. The case heated up in 2011 when Sony sought to use the two Robert Johnson photos on The Centennial Collection.
Mississippi Code. Ann. '15-1-49 provided a three-year statute of limitations for Anderson and Harris's claims. Anderson and Harris argued that their claims didn't accrue until the state court decided that Claud Johnson was the sole heir of his father's estate. But the trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?