Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Supreme Court of Mississippi decided that the estate of the sister of blues legend Robert Johnson waited too long to file suit to obtain royalties and fees from two rare photos of Johnson. Anderson v. LaVere, 2012-CA-00601. Johnson died in 1938. In 1974, his half-sister Carrie Thompson entered into an agency agreement for music producer Steven LaVere to exploit Johnson content. LaVere then procured a deal with CBS Records, today owned by Sony Music. When Thompson died in 1983, she left her estate to her half-sister Annye Anderson and grandson Robert Harris. In 1990, CBS released The Complete Recordings of Robert Johnson, which included the two photos in the packaging. In 1991, a state judge appointed an administrator for Robert Johnson's estate and, in 1998, the Mississippi Chancery Court ruled that Johnson's son Claud was sole heir of the blues artist's estate.
Anderson and Harris sued Johnson, LaVere and Sony Music in 2000 over monies earned from the photos. The causes of action included fraud, unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty. The case heated up in 2011 when Sony sought to use the two Robert Johnson photos on The Centennial Collection.
Mississippi Code. Ann. '15-1-49 provided a three-year statute of limitations for Anderson and Harris's claims. Anderson and Harris argued that their claims didn't accrue until the state court decided that Claud Johnson was the sole heir of his father's estate. But the trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants.
Affirming, the state supreme court wrote: “Though it is likely, as the trial court ruled, that Anderson and Harris discovered their cause of action in 1990 when they learned of Sony's upcoming release of The Complete Recordings, there is no question that they were aware of their injury ' and their claims against all appellees ' at the latest in 1991, when LaVere began paying all royalties and fees under the 1974 agreement to the Johnson estate, rather than to Thompson's estate.”
Stan Soocher'is Editor-in-Chief of'Entertainment Law & Finance'and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at'[email protected]'or via'www.stansoocher.com.
The Supreme Court of Mississippi decided that the estate of the sister of blues legend
Anderson and Harris sued Johnson, LaVere and Sony Music in 2000 over monies earned from the photos. The causes of action included fraud, unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty. The case heated up in 2011 when Sony sought to use the two
Mississippi Code. Ann. '15-1-49 provided a three-year statute of limitations for Anderson and Harris's claims. Anderson and Harris argued that their claims didn't accrue until the state court decided that Claud Johnson was the sole heir of his father's estate. But the trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants.
Affirming, the state supreme court wrote: “Though it is likely, as the trial court ruled, that Anderson and Harris discovered their cause of action in 1990 when they learned of Sony's upcoming release of The Complete Recordings, there is no question that they were aware of their injury ' and their claims against all appellees ' at the latest in 1991, when LaVere began paying all royalties and fees under the 1974 agreement to the Johnson estate, rather than to Thompson's estate.”
Stan Soocher'is Editor-in-Chief of'Entertainment Law & Finance'and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at'[email protected]'or via'www.stansoocher.com.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.