Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The focus on proportionality in high-profile cases such as Apple v. Samsung (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2013), coupled with the recent proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) are driving attorneys to reevaluate the methods by which they uncover crucial electronic evidence for a case.
The proposed changes to the FRCP focus on proportionality, putting the burden on counsel to both maintain proportionality and ensure the thoroughness of an e-discovery effort. Statistical sampling, while not necessarily new, is emerging as a reliable method for addressing the new e-discovery standards the courts may soon be enforcing.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.