Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
March 2014 turned out to be a big month for copyright litigation settlements. They all came without warning, but two seemed to make a lot of sense. Viacom Inc.'s landmark fight with YouTube was a holdover from an earlier era, and Viacom was facing diminishing returns on its second appeal. And why would the Beastie Boys and upstart toymaker GoldieBlox Inc. want to waste more legal bills on a dustup over a viral video that used the Beastie song “Girls” as the basis for a GoldieBlox advertisement.
A third settlement ' a truce between famed “appropriation” artist Richard Prince and photographer Patrick Cariou ' was a bit harder to explain. The duo still had plenty to fight about, and the plaintiff, Cariou, was back before a seemingly sympathetic judge with respected media industry amici on his side.
Cariou
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?