Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The first quarter of 2014 is over. The major provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Affordable Care Act, ACA or Act) are now in full swing, save the occasional delay of certain mandates. Companies, both large and small, understand that this law is now a fixture of our legislative structure. It's not being repealed and it's not being overturned. Instead, it will be amended, tugged at, pulled at, changed, expanded, and contracted. That's how legislation works. In all of these changes, which are occurring on a continual basis, legislative impact is not the only impact that necessitates attention. The private marketplace, which has a major role in the changes brought about by the ACA, plays a crucial role in the development of the law, as well as the resulting impact on employers.
'Seismic Shifts'
So, what does that mean? It means the law with respect to providing employer-provided health insurance is changing. It is shifting in greater proportions than we've ever seen before. Shifts in great proportions like this result in significant consequences, which lead to a “seismic shift.” With these great shifts, the way companies provide, and pay for, employee health benefits is also changing, thus contributing to the seismic shift. Benefits, and the provision thereof, was once only a Human Resources issue. However, a resulting factor of this seismic shift is that benefits issues have now fallen at the doorstep, or on the board room table, of the C-Suite.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?